ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0389

Vaccine Effectiveness Among Patients with Psoriatic Disease: A Population-based Study

Lihi Eder1, Idit Lavi2, Amir Haddad3, Nili Stein4, Ilan feldhamer5, ARNON DOV COHEN5, Walid Saliba2 and Devy Zisman2, 1Women’s College Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, 3Carmel Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel, 4Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, 5Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: COVID-19, Infection, population studies, Psoriatic arthritis, Spondyloarthropathies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: We assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing SARS-CoV2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalizations in patients with psoriatic disease (PsD) and non-psoriatic controls, and the association of immune-modulating medications on these COVID-19-related outcomes.

Methods: A population-based study was performed using the data from the Clalit Health Services in Israel. We assembled a cohort of patients with diagnoses of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis (collectively termed PsD) and matched them by age, sex, and clinic (1:5 ratio) with non-psoriatic controls. For assessment of vaccine effectiveness, the following 2 periods were analyzed separately: Period 1 which corresponds to initiation of COVID-19 vaccinations until initiation of booster vaccines (December 2020-August 2021); Period 2 corresponds to initiation of booster vaccines to end of study (August 2021-December 2021). Study outcomes included: SARS-CoV2 PCR positivity and hospitalization for COVID-19. For assessment of the association of medications and COVID-19-related outcomes, we performed a matched nested case-control study within the PsD cohort in which each case (SARS-CoV2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalization) was matched with 10 controls (negative for these outcomes). Vaccine effectiveness was assessed using regression models with time varying covariates for vaccination status adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and medication use.

Results: A total of 128,754 patients with PsD and 600,439 controls (5,934 vs. 26,292 positive SARS-CoV2; 315 vs. 1,127 hospitalized, respectively). Vaccine effectiveness for SARS-CoV2 infection was similar among patients with PsD and controls (HR for 2nd vaccine: 0.20 vs. 0.20, respectively; Figure 1A). Vaccine effectiveness for COVID-19 hospitalization was also similar among PsD patients and controls (HR for 2nd vaccine: 0.15 vs. 0.08, respectively; Figure 2A). Booster vaccines remained effective in reducing risk of infections (HRs for of 3rdvaccine: 0.41) and hospitalization (HR for of 3rd vaccine < 0.01) among patients with PsD. When the analysis was restricted to patients with PsD and adjusted for use of systemic therapies, vaccines remained effective for SARS-CoV2 infections (OR period 1: 2nd vaccine: 0.19; OR period 2: 3rd vaccine: < 0.01; Figure 1B) and hospitalizations (OR period 1: 2nd vaccine: 0.01; OR period 2: 3rd vaccine: 0.17; Figure 2B). Use of etanercept was associated with higher risk of SARS-CoV2 infection and JAK inhibitors use was associated with higher risk of hospitalizations (Table 1). PsA status was not associated with higher risk of both outcomes compared to patients with psoriasis alone.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 vaccine has similar effectiveness in patients with PsD to that seen in non-psoriatic controls. Risk of COVID-19 hospitalization among PsD patients may be influenced by certain immune modulating therapies.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Figure 1 – Vaccine effectiveness for SARS-CoV2 infection in patients with PsD vs. controls (1A) and among patients with PsD alone (1B)

Supporting image 3

Figure 2 – Vaccine effectiveness for COVID_19 hospitalization in patients with PsD vs. controls (2A) and among patients with PsD alone (2B)


Disclosures: L. Eder, AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer; I. Lavi, None; A. Haddad, None; N. Stein, None; I. feldhamer, None; A. DOV COHEN, None; W. Saliba, None; D. Zisman, Pfizer, Elli Lilly, AbbVie/Abbott, Janssen.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eder L, Lavi I, Haddad A, Stein N, feldhamer I, DOV COHEN A, Saliba W, Zisman D. Vaccine Effectiveness Among Patients with Psoriatic Disease: A Population-based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vaccine-effectiveness-among-patients-with-psoriatic-disease-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vaccine-effectiveness-among-patients-with-psoriatic-disease-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology