ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1802

Utility of Repeat Latent Tuberculosis Testing in Patients Taking Biologics

Urmi Khanna1, Ariana Ellis 2, AbdulAziz Galadari 3, Jeffery Hu 4, Josh Gallop 5, M. Elaine Husni 6 and Anthony Fernandez 7, 1Department of Dermatology , Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 2Northeast Ohio Medical University, Cleveland, OH, 3Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, Cleveland, 4Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 5Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 6Department of Rheumatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 7Department of Dermatology and Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: autoimmune diseases and drug safety monitoring, Biologic agents, Clinical research, Tuberculosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M090: Infection-Related Rheumatic Disease (1800–1805)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Guidelines for repeat Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) testing while on biologics are not clearly defined. The American College of Rheumatology recommends repeat LTBI screening only in persons with risk factors for tuberculosis(TB) whereas the National Psoriasis Foundation recommends repeat annual LTBI screening in all patients on biologics. Furthermore, recommendations for annual LTBI screening for patients on biologics have been incorporated into the Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment Systems and will impact physician reimbursement. However, little evidence supports that this practice of repeat annual screening is clinically valuable and/or cost-effective in patients on biologics.

Objective: To determine the value and cost-effectiveness of serial LTBI screening in patients taking biologics and to identify risk factors in patients who convert from negative to positive QuantiFERON TB test (QFT) results while on biologics.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed LTBI screening results in patients treated with biologics for chronic inflammatory/autoimmune conditions at a single, tertiary care center between August 2007 and March 2019. For each patient, we collected demographic information, primary underlying diagnosis, biologics used, length of biologic therapy, number of QFTs and QFT results. Patients without repeat QFT results following biologic initiation and/or all QFTs outside the treatment period with biologics were eliminated from the study.

Results: Of 10,914 patients treated with biologics and with QFT results, 5212 had >1 repeat QFT result after starting biologic therapy (mean 3.2 per patient) and were included in our study (Table 1). The most common medical diagnosis in the study cohort were Inflammatory Bowel Disease (31%), Rheumatoid Arthritis (29%) and Psoriasis +/- Psoriatic Arthritis (25%). Majority patients had all negative QFTs (87.5%, n=4561), 9.2 % patients (n=479) had >1 indeterminate QFT and 3.3% patients (n=172) had >1 positive QFT (Table 2). Amongst patients with positive QFTs, only 61 patients converted from a negative to a positive QFT after initiation of biologic therapy. Importantly, only one case of active TB was found in the entire study cohort and this patient had a significant risk factor in the form of recent travel to a TB endemic area.

Conclusion: This represents the largest single institution study evaluating rates of QFT test positivity/conversion in patients taking biologics. Repeat LTBI testing in patients taking biologics revealed a low rate of conversion (1.17%), suggesting low clinical value and an undesirable cost-benefit ratio. Additionally, a high percentage of positive QFT converters had risk factors for TB exposure. Our results suggest clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of repeat LTBI screening in patients on biologics may be more valuable if not performed routinely, but driven by a focused review of TB exposure risk factors in each patient.


Table 1


Table 2


Disclosure: U. Khanna, None; A. Ellis, None; A. Galadari, None; J. Hu, None; J. Gallop, None; M. Husni, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, Regeneron, Pfizer and UCB, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Genentech, 5, Janssen, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, 3, Novartis, 5, PASE questionnaires, 7, Pfizer, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, UCB, 5; A. Fernandez, Pfizer, 2, AbbVie, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Mallinckrodt, 2, 5, 8, Corbus, 2, UCB, 5, Roche, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khanna U, Ellis A, Galadari A, Hu J, Gallop J, Husni M, Fernandez A. Utility of Repeat Latent Tuberculosis Testing in Patients Taking Biologics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-repeat-latent-tuberculosis-testing-in-patients-taking-biologics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-repeat-latent-tuberculosis-testing-in-patients-taking-biologics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology