ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1539

Ustekinumab and TNF Inhibitors Similarly Improve Patient-perceived Impact of Psoriatic Arthritis but Differentially Affect the Scale Subdomains: Results from a European Observational Cohort Study

Laure Gossec1, Stefan Siebert 2, Paul Bergmans 3, Kurt De Vlam 4, Elisa Gremese 5, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez 6, Ellie Korendowych 7, Tatiana Korotaeva 8, Wim Noël 9, Michael Nurmohamed 10, Christophe Richez 11, Petros Sfikakis 12, Pavel Smirnov 13, Elke Theander 14 and Josef Smolen 15, 1Sorbonne Université and Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 2Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 3Biostatistics and Medical Affairs, Janssen, Tilburg, Netherlands, 4University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 5Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, 6Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, 7Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, 8Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia, 9Biostatistics and Medical Affairs, Janssen, Brussels, Belgium, 10Reade and VU Rheumatology Research Department, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 11Pellegrin Hospital, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 12Joint Rheumatology Programme, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece, 13Biostatistics and Medical Affairs, Janssen, Moscow, Russia, 14Biostatistics and Medical Affairs, Janssen, Solna, Sweden, 15Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: patient outcomes and biologic treatments, quality of life

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis strongly impacts patients’ quality of life (QoL). Insights on the effects of biologic treatments on different domains of health-related QoL in a real-world setting are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of 6 months of therapy with ustekinumab (UST) or TNF inhibitor (TNFi) on the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire (PsAID-12) and its subdomains.

Methods: The PsABio study (NCT02627768) evaluates effectiveness, tolerability and persistence of 1st, 2nd or 3rd-line UST or TNFi in patients with PsA. Changes from baseline (BL) to 6 months were evaluated in total PsAID-12 and subdomains. Completer analyses were performed on patients staying on UST or TNFi for the full 6 months as well as intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses using non-responder imputation. PsAID-12 was also analyzed as change above the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of -1.25 points (Holland R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:343–347), and a patient-acceptable state of PsAID-12 score ≤4. UST and TNFi effectiveness were compared using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for BL confounders.

Results: Of 930 patients, 886 (426 on UST and 442 on TNFi) had evaluable data at BL and 6 months (ITT population, Table 1). This population analysis included patients who had stopped/switched UST (6.6%) or TNFi (10.0%) before 6 months. At BL, significant differences between UST and TNFi groups existed in terms of age (UST patients were older), line of treatment (UST more frequently 3rd-line), NSAID and methotrexate use (less in UST), FiRST score (more chronic widespread pain in UST), and skin involvement (higher in UST). In the ITT analysis, after 6 months, PsAID-12 total score improved by 27.6% for UST (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.6, 33.5) and 32.8% for TNFi (95% CI 28.4, 37.1). MCID improvement was reached by 53.9% (95% CI 48.8, 58.9) of UST and 57.7% (95% CI 52.4, 62.8) of TNFi-treated patients; and 53.1% (95% CI 48.1, 58.1) and 55.4% (95% CI 50.3, 60.4) respectively achieved the patient acceptable state of PsAID (PS-adjusted OR [95% CI] UST vs TNFi: 0.85 [0.61, 1.19]). All PsAID domains also demonstrated improvement (Table 2), with differences between UST and TNFi for the subdomains of impact of pain and skin problems (Table 2).

Conclusion: Both UST and TNFi treatment for 6 months are efficacious in reducing impact of PsA and improving patients’ QoL, measured by PsAID-12. After PS adjustment for BL imbalances, the improvements seen with UST and TNFi were not significantly different with regard to total PsAID score, though differences were noted for impact of pain (favoring TNFi) and skin problems (favoring UST). This is the first report on the effects of these drugs on QoL in a real-life setting.


Disclosure: L. Gossec, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, SAnofi-Aventis, UCB, 5, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Celgene, 5, Celgene Corporation, 2, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, MSD, 5, Nordic Pharma, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, UCB, 5; S. Siebert, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; P. Bergmans, Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1, 4; K. De Vlam, Johnson & Johnson, 5; E. Gremese, AbbVie, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; B. Joven-Ibáñez, Celgene, 8, Novartis, 8, MSD, 8, Pfizer, 8, AbbVie, 8, Janssen, 8; E. Korendowych, AbbVie, 2, 5, Novartis, 5, Janssen, 5, UCB, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5; T. Korotaeva, Pfizer, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Biocad, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis-Sandoz, 5, 8; W. Noël, Janssen, 3; M. Nurmohamed, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Mundipharma, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Menarini, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8; C. Richez, astrazeneca, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Glenmark, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; P. Sfikakis, None; P. Smirnov, Janssen, 3; E. Theander, Janssen, 3; J. Smolen, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 8, Astra-Zeneca, 5, Astro, 5, 8, BMS, 5, Celgene, 5, 8, Celltrion, 5, Celtrion, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, 8, ILTOO, 5, 8, ILTOO Janssen, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Medimmune, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, Novartis- Sandoz, 5, Novartis-Sandoz, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Roche;, 2, 5, 8, Samsung, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, UCB, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gossec L, Siebert S, Bergmans P, De Vlam K, Gremese E, Joven-Ibáñez B, Korendowych E, Korotaeva T, Noël W, Nurmohamed M, Richez C, Sfikakis P, Smirnov P, Theander E, Smolen J. Ustekinumab and TNF Inhibitors Similarly Improve Patient-perceived Impact of Psoriatic Arthritis but Differentially Affect the Scale Subdomains: Results from a European Observational Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ustekinumab-and-tnf-inhibitors-similarly-improve-patient-perceived-impact-of-psoriatic-arthritis-but-differentially-affect-the-scale-subdomains-results-from-a-european-observational-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ustekinumab-and-tnf-inhibitors-similarly-improve-patient-perceived-impact-of-psoriatic-arthritis-but-differentially-affect-the-scale-subdomains-results-from-a-european-observational-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology