ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1423

Using Self-Reported Patient Experiences to Evaluate Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments: Learnings from Digital Patient Communities in Psoriatic Arthritis

Stephen Doogan1, John Heid2, Samir Benosman3, Alexis Ogdie4, Layne Martin5, Prashanth Sunkureddi6 and Jacqueline Palmer7, 1Real Life Sciences, New York, NY, 2Kinapse, Inc, London, United Kingdom, 3Advisory Services, Kinapse, Inc, London, United Kingdom, 4University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5CreakyJoints, NY, 6Rheumatology, Clear Lake Rheumatology Center, Nassau Bay, TX, 7Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: patient outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis, quality of life and social media

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a debilitating disease with significant impact on patient quality of life (QoL).  While patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments broadly capture patient experiences with PsA, they may not identify the full extent of issues patients face.  In this study, we compared the types of experiences patients self-report online to concepts captured within commonly used PRO instruments in PsA.

Methods:  We collected unguided patient narratives reported between January 2010 and May 2016 from 31 online sources. 56% of narratives were from health social networking sites, 22% from disease-specific patient forums, 9.9% from general health forums, and 0.1% from mainstream social media. Using natural language processing combined with manual curation, we evaluated patient reported experiences within narratives and categorized them into 5 high level themes: Social (e.g. family burden), Physical (e.g. pain), Emotional (e.g. anxiety), Cognitive (e.g. memory), and Role Activity (e.g. work), or SPEC-R.  For comparison, the same SPEC-R categorization was applied to 3 PRO instruments: the Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life tool (PsAQoL), Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease tool (PSAID), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The instruments were then evaluated based on their capacity to capture the concepts and sub-concepts extracted from patient narratives.

Results:  15,390 narratives from 3,139 patients were qualified into the sample for analysis. Across the SPEC-R categories, Physical concepts were reported by 81.6% of patients, Emotional concepts by 60.7%, Cognitive concepts by 20.0%, Role Activity concepts by 8.1%, and Social concepts by 5.6%. In addition, 66.8% of patients reported general concepts (e.g. “Feeling unwell”) that could not otherwise be classified into the SPEC-R categories.    Pain and dermatology related issues were the most reported physical sub-concepts (66% and 26%, respectively). Emotional concepts were mainly comprised of anxiety (60%) and depression (38%). Cognitive concepts were characterized by impulsive behavior (25%) and balance/coordination issues (12%). Patients reporting Role Activity concepts focused on work/school performance (55%) and parenting (17%). Among patients reporting Social concepts, family burden (50%) and relationships with spouses (27%) were most frequent. While PRO instruments capture many physical and social concepts and sub-concepts, many sub-concepts within other SPEC-R categories were not captured by either PsA-specific or general health related PRO instruments (see table).

Conclusion:   This study offers insight into a variety of patient experiences with PsA.  The physical and emotional impact of PsA dominates self-reported patient experiences.  PROs capture many of the physical and emotional impairments of PsA, but may miss key cognitive and role activity issues that affect patient QoL. Table 1. Fit/Gap Analysis of PsA PRO Tools with regards to Reported SPEC-R Concepts and Sub-concepts

SPEC-R Category (% of patients) Top 3 Reported Sub-concepts % of SPEC-R Category PsAQoL SF-36 PSAID
Physical (81.5%)   Pain 65.6% N Y Y
Dermatological Issues* 25.7% N N Y
Musculoskeletal Issues* 21.7% Y Y N
Emotional (50.7%)   Anxiety 60.2% N Y Y
Depression / Sadness 37.9% Y Y Y
Anger / Frustration 10.1% Y N N
Cognitive (20.0%)   Impulsive Behavior* 25.3% N N N
Balance/Coordination 12.4% N N N
Memory Issues 9.9% N N N
Role Activity (8.1%) Work/School Performance 55.5% N Y Y
Parenting 17.3% N N N
Work/School Absenteeism 15.7% N Y N
Social (5.6%)   Family Burden 50.0% N N N
Relationships (Partner/Spouse) 26.5% Y Y Y
Social Activities (Group) 14.5% Y Y Y
* Example symptoms and impairments within selected sub-concepts: Dermatological Issues: rash, itching, scaling Musculoskeletal Issues: joint swelling, trigger finger, muscle spasms Impulsive Behavior: restlessness, substance abuse, eating related disorders Abbreviations: SPEC-R: Social, Physical, Emotional, Cognitive, Role Activity PsAQoL: Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life Instrument PSAID: Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease SF-36: Short Form health survey 36-items

 


Disclosure: S. Doogan, None; J. Heid, None; S. Benosman, None; A. Ogdie, None; L. Martin, None; P. Sunkureddi, None; J. Palmer, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Doogan S, Heid J, Benosman S, Ogdie A, Martin L, Sunkureddi P, Palmer J. Using Self-Reported Patient Experiences to Evaluate Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments: Learnings from Digital Patient Communities in Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-self-reported-patient-experiences-to-evaluate-patient-reported-outcomes-pro-instruments-learnings-from-digital-patient-communities-in-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-self-reported-patient-experiences-to-evaluate-patient-reported-outcomes-pro-instruments-learnings-from-digital-patient-communities-in-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology