ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1255

Using PROs to Guide Patient-Centered Conversations and Care in Inflammatory Arthritis: The Clinician Perspective

Susan J. Bartlett1, Katherine Clegg Smith2, Elaine de Leon2, Michelle Jones3, Anna Kristina Gutierrez4, Allie Butanis5 and Clifton O. Bingham III6, 1Department of Medicine, Division of ClinEpi, Rheumatology, Respirology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 4Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 5Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 6Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Communication, doctor-patient relationship, PROMIS, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and shared dicision making

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are routinely collected for research and quality purposes, they have not been routinely incorporated into the routine care of patients. Clinicians are best able to provide chronic disease care that is patient-centered when they have a better understanding of their patients’ lived experiences. We hypothesized that having PRO results describing the range of symptoms and impacts of living with RA during clinic visits would provide insight into patient priorities, values, and preferences and facilitate SDM around treatment choices. Evidence for the impact of PROs on patient management from the clinician’s perspective are presented.

Methods: Participants with RA in an observational study at an academic arthritis center completed PROMIS fatigue, pain, physical function, sleep, and participation on a tablet in the waiting room. Reports of results in numerical and graphical formats were available during the visit for review. Semi-structured interviews were used to query the experiences of rheumatologists and rheumatology fellows on the impact of PROs on RA patient management.

Results: Data are from interviews with 4 rheumatologists and 6 fellow trainees. Among rheumatologists, access to real-time PROMIS results that could be addressed during the visit was highly valued. All stated that completing questionnaires helped patient feel “heard” and discussing results made it clear that patients’ experiences mattered. Several said reports prompted them to ask about symptoms they may have overlooked. There was concern that some symptoms (depression, anxiety) may have little to do with RA; identifying these without a clear pathway to resources was potentially problematic. All noted that how they used results differed depending on the needs of specific patients and the nature of the visit. While rheumatologists felt able to control the time spent discussing results, fellows expressed less certainty about their ability to control conversations, the value of additional PROs for RA care, or its impact on decision-making. Fellows also reported greater discomfort discussing results if they had not yet built a rapport with patients.

Conclusion: Expanded real-time assessments of RA symptom and impacts on day-to-day life as part of routine care appears to offer important new information to make RA care more patient-centered by informing discussions and facilitating shared decision-making around treatment. For trainees, the value of additional symptom information was balanced by concerns about greater time challenges, ways to integrate results into discussions and care plans, and availability of resources to address new problems that were identified. Results highlight opportunities to enhance broader communication skills training around potentially sensitive topics and quality of life in rheumatology training programs.

Funding PCORI IP2-PI0000737 and SC14-1402-10818.


Disclosure: S. J. Bartlett, None; K. Clegg Smith, None; E. de Leon, None; M. Jones, None; A. K. Gutierrez, None; A. Butanis, None; C. O. Bingham III, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bartlett SJ, Clegg Smith K, de Leon E, Jones M, Gutierrez AK, Butanis A, Bingham CO III. Using PROs to Guide Patient-Centered Conversations and Care in Inflammatory Arthritis: The Clinician Perspective [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-pros-to-guide-patient-centered-conversations-and-care-in-inflammatory-arthritis-the-clinician-perspective/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-pros-to-guide-patient-centered-conversations-and-care-in-inflammatory-arthritis-the-clinician-perspective/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology