ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1679

Usefulness of Cardiac Screening in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Anti-Ro Positive Antibodies

Jordi Camins Fàbregas1, Melania Martinez-Morillo1, Aina Teniente-Serra2, Anne Riveros3, Sergi Heredia3, Agueda Prior4, Susana Holgado1, Lourdes Mateo1, Maria Aparicio1, Laia Gifre1, Ivette Casafont-Solé1, Yaiza Garcia1, Gladys Juncà5, Roger Villuendas5, Antoni Bayés-Genis5, Eva Martínez-Cáceres2 and Alejandro Olivé-Marqués1, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain, 2Immunology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain, 3Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain, 5Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus and antibodies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster II: Biomarkers and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Cardiac block in neonatal lupus is associated with placental transfer of anti-Ro antibodies. The effect of these antibodies on cardiac conduction disorders in adult patients is controversial. Association between anti-Ro antibodies and heart rhythm disorders have been described in isolated cases. However, there are just a few studies that analyse the relationship between autoimmune diseases and electrocardiographic disturbances. Our aim is to determine if there are differences in cardiac conduction of SLE patients in presence of anti-Ro antibodies.

Methods:

All patients included fulfilled the SLE criteria (SLICC 2012) and were followed up in a single centre. Patients taking drugs that alter cardiac conduction (except antimalarial drugs) and those who had heart or thyroid disease were discarded. All patients were assessed blindly by a cardiologist who performed an interrogation and physical examination, an electrocardiogram, an echocardiogram and a 24-hour Holter study. Besides, a rheumatologist performed a clinical and analytical assessment including a qualitative analysis by immunoblotting of anti-Ro Ab and a quantification by chemiluminescence of the anti-Ro52 and Ro60 Ab. The presence of other SLE specific Ab (ANA, DNA, antiphospholipid) was also analysed by immunoblot, indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA. Clinical, analytical activity and damage indexes were collected (SLEDAI and SLICC).

Results:

145 patients were included: 92% women, mean age 45±2, average disease duration 11 years. Patients were undergoing the following treatments: antimalarial 91%, mycophenolate 20%, azathioprine 12%, biological treatment 5% and glucocorticoids 70%. The clinical characteristics are summarized in table 1.

There were no significant differences between positive and negative anti-Ro Ab in terms of gender, age, clinical characteristics or cardiovascular risk factors. None of the patients was affected by an atrio-ventricular block and the rest of the electrocardiographic alterations had no clinical significance and did not predominate in the positive Ro Ab group. Additionally, no differences in heart rate, ventricular extrasystoles or PR, QT or QRS intervals were detected between both groups. The echocardiogram’s findings were not relevant and there were no differences between groups. Since the majority of patients with SLE are double positive differences between two subspecificities of Ro (52 and 60) could not be analysed. On the other hand, no differences were found in cardiac conduction regarding the treatments received, the activity or damage indexes, or the analytical or clinical characteristics of the patients.

Conclusion:

The study results show that there are no differences in cardiac conduction according to the presence of anti-Ro antibodies in SLE patients. Thus, the cardiac screening in SLE patients with anti-Ro positive antibodies seems not helpful in clinical practice.

Cumulative clinical manifestations (%)

Articular

80

Cutaneous

63

Leuco-lymphopenia

42

Renal

24

Serositis

30

Neurologic

9

Secondary antiphopholipid syndrome

10

Secondary Sjögren syndrome

10

Activity and damage indexes

SLICC

0,32 ± 0,7

SLEDAI at diagnosis

7,97 ± 4,2

SLEDAI at inclusion

1,82 ± 2,48

Laboratory

Increased DNA

51 %

Mean DNA

207,86 ± 357 (UI/L)

Hypocomplementemia

39 %

Anti-Ro positive antibodies

31 %


Disclosure: J. Camins Fàbregas, None; M. Martinez-Morillo, None; A. Teniente-Serra, None; A. Riveros, None; S. Heredia, None; A. Prior, None; S. Holgado, None; L. Mateo, None; M. Aparicio, None; L. Gifre, None; I. Casafont-Solé, None; Y. Garcia, None; G. Juncà, None; R. Villuendas, None; A. Bayés-Genis, None; E. Martínez-Cáceres, None; A. Olivé-Marqués, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Camins Fàbregas J, Martinez-Morillo M, Teniente-Serra A, Riveros A, Heredia S, Prior A, Holgado S, Mateo L, Aparicio M, Gifre L, Casafont-Solé I, Garcia Y, Juncà G, Villuendas R, Bayés-Genis A, Martínez-Cáceres E, Olivé-Marqués A. Usefulness of Cardiac Screening in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Anti-Ro Positive Antibodies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/usefulness-of-cardiac-screening-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-anti-ro-positive-antibodies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/usefulness-of-cardiac-screening-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-anti-ro-positive-antibodies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology