ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1463

Use of Telemedicine for Follow-up of Lupus Nephritis in the COVID-19 Outbreak: The 6-month Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

ho SO1, Evelyn Chow1, Isaac Cheng1, Xerox Lau1, Tena Li1, Cheuk Chun Szeto1 and Lai-Shan Tam2, 1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Abstracts: SLE – Treatment: New Agents, Old Agents (1458–1463)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:45PM-5:00PM

Background/Purpose: Telemedicine (TM) has been widely advocated and used to follow up patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, there is no evidence supporting its use in systemic lupus erythematosus. We aimed to evaluate the short-term patient satisfaction, compliance, disease control and infection risk of TM compared with standard in-person follow-up (FU) for patients with lupus nephritis (LN) during the pandemic.

Methods: This was a single-center open-label randomized controlled study. Consecutive patients followed at the LN clinic were randomized to either TM or standard FU (SF) group in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the TM group received FU via videoconferencing. SF group patients continued conventional in-person outpatient care. The 6-month data were compared and presented.

Results: From June to December 2020, 122 patients were randomized (TM: 60, SF: 62) and had at least 2 FUs. There were no baseline differences, including SLEDAI-2k and proportion of patients in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), between the 2 groups except a higher physician global assessment score (PGA) in the TM group (table). After a mean FU of 19.8±4.5 weeks, the overall patient satisfaction score was higher in the TM group with a significantly shorter waiting time from entering the clinic waiting room (virtual or real) to seeing a rheumatologist (figure). More patients in the TM group had hospitalization (15/60, 25.0% vs 7/62, 11.3%; p=0.049) with higher baseline PGA (OR=1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23) being the independent predictor. The proportions of patients remained in LLDAS were similar in the 2 groups (TM: 75.0% vs SF: 74.2%, p=0.919). None of the patients had COVID-19.

Conclusion: TM FU resulted in better patient satisfaction and similar short-term disease control in patients with LN compared to standard care. However, it was associated with more hospitalizations and might need to be complemented by in-person visits especially in patients with higher PGA.

Table Baseline clinical data of the recruited patients and comparison between the telemedicine/standard follow-up groups

Figure A. Mean waiting time between entering the clinic waiting room (virtual or real) and seeing a rheumatologist. TM = Telemedicine, SF = Standard follow-up. B. Satisfaction scores of patients who used TM) compared to SF. Response is shown as percentage with positive responses on the right. The neutral category was removed when calculating percentages.


Disclosures: h. SO, None; E. Chow, None; I. Cheng, None; X. Lau, None; T. Li, None; C. Szeto, None; L. Tam, Janssen, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, AbbVie, 2, Novartis, 5, Amgen, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Sanofi, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

SO h, Chow E, Cheng I, Lau X, Li T, Szeto C, Tam L. Use of Telemedicine for Follow-up of Lupus Nephritis in the COVID-19 Outbreak: The 6-month Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-telemedicine-for-follow-up-of-lupus-nephritis-in-the-covid-19-outbreak-the-6-month-results-of-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-telemedicine-for-follow-up-of-lupus-nephritis-in-the-covid-19-outbreak-the-6-month-results-of-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology