ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 577

Use of Subcutaneous MTX Does Not Prolong the Use of Traditional DMARD in Multi-DMARD Regimens and Has Insignificant Differences in Liver Enzymes Abnormalities When Compared with Oral MTX in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Veteran Affairs Administrative Database Study

Bernard Ng, Rheumatology, U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs- Puget Sound Healthsystem, Seattle, WA; Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Our previous analyses using the national administrative database from Veteran
Health Administration showed that RA patient who were switched from oral to subcutaneous
MTX due to intolerance or lack of response were more likely to stay on
methotrexate monotherapy longer. We seek to determine if RA patients who were
on multiple traditional DMARD stay longer on traditional DMARD when subcutaneous
MTX was used. We also compare the occurrences of liver enzymes abnormalities
between those on subcutaneous MTX with those on oral therapy.

Methods: The
duration of multiple traditional DMARD therapy, defined as the time between
starting the use of a multiple traditional DMARD regimen that includes
methotrexate and the switch to or addition of biologics, is compared between
those on oral methotrexate and those on subcutaneous methotrexate for at least
30 days using a Wilcoxon-Matt-Whitney test. 
Factors that could potentially influence the duration of multiple
traditional DMARD use include: gender, age, race, and maximum MTX dose. These
factors were assessed using a log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox
regression models were run to correct for patient variables. Liver enzyme
abnormalities were compared between patients on subcutaneous and oral MTX who received
MTX monotherapy for >30 days; abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels
and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were defined as exceeding twice the
upper limit of normal.

Results: Of the 13,254
patients who were treated with a DMARD for at least 90 days, 6541 were on more
than one DMARD at any point in time, and in 3586, MTX was included in the multiple
DMARD regimens. There were 1837 biologic starts among these 3586 patients (1604
were treated with oral MTX, 197 with subcutaneous MTX). Patient treated with
oral MTX remained on multiple traditional DMARD for a mean (SD) of 683 (650)
days compared with 580 (595) days for patients treated with subcutaneous MTX
(P=0.014). Based on log-rank tests (see figure), the use of subcutaneous MTX was
associated with significantly shorter duration of traditional multiple DMARD
therapy use (P=0.025). After adjustment for patient variables using Cox
regression models, the association of subcutaneous MTX use with the duration on
multiple traditional DMARD therapy was no longer significant (P=0.107). Age and
race remained significantly associated after corrections. Of the patients
treated with MTX who had ALT and/or AST levels assessed, the rates of abnormal
ALT and AST levels were not significantly different between those receiving
oral and subcutaneous MTX (P=0.090 and P=0.924, respectively).

Conclusion: Unlike
the duration of MTX monotherapy, the duration of multiple traditional DMARD use
was not significantly associated with use of subcutaneous MTX. Among those
using MTX for >30 days, there was no
significant differences in liver enzyme abnormalities between patients treated
with subcutaneous MTX and oral MTX.


Disclosure: B. Ng, Antares Pharma, 2;

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ng B. Use of Subcutaneous MTX Does Not Prolong the Use of Traditional DMARD in Multi-DMARD Regimens and Has Insignificant Differences in Liver Enzymes Abnormalities When Compared with Oral MTX in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Veteran Affairs Administrative Database Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-subcutaneous-mtx-does-not-prolong-the-use-of-traditional-dmard-in-multi-dmard-regimens-and-has-insignificant-differences-in-liver-enzymes-abnormalities-when-compared-with-oral-mtx-in-patients-w/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-subcutaneous-mtx-does-not-prolong-the-use-of-traditional-dmard-in-multi-dmard-regimens-and-has-insignificant-differences-in-liver-enzymes-abnormalities-when-compared-with-oral-mtx-in-patients-w/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology