ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1054

Use Of Oral and Subcutaneous MTX In a Commercially Insured Rheumatoid Arthritis Population

Jeffrey R. Curtis1, Fenglong Xie2, Jie Zhang3, Lang Chen4, Huifeng Yun5, Michael H. Schiff6, Timothy Beukelman7 and Seth Ginsberg8, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 6Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 7Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 8Creaky Joints, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Medicare, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services II & III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most commonly used medication in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although use of oral and subcutaneous (SQ) preparations in real-world settings has not been well characterized.

Methods:

Using national data from a large commercially insured population in the U.S. from 2005-2011, we identified RA patients (pts) on the basis of 2 RA diagnosis codes initiating oral MTX (no prior use ever, minimum of 6m clean period) who also had no prior use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), sulfasalazine (SSZ), leflunomide (LEF) or biologic use and had at least one year of follow-up available. Subsequent dose escalation of oral MTX or switch to SQ MTX, HCQ, SSZ, and LEF were characterized. Subsequent use and timing of addition of biologics was examined for those had at least one switch, adjusting for multiple potential confounders using Cox proportional hazards models with switch date as time zero.

Results:

New oral MTX users (n=4,048) were 74.2% women, had mean +- SD age of 51.1+- 11.9 years and contributed a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.4 (1.6, 3.6) years; 28.1% never changed dose of oral MTX and remained at their starting dose; common doses included 10.0 mg/week (24.9%) and 15.0mg/week (26.3%). Of all patients, only 48.2% used oral MTX at >= 20mg/week at any time. Overall, 73.8% stayed on oral MTX (with or without dose increase) and did not add or switch to HCQ, SSZ, LEF, or SQ MTX. The remainder switched or added HCQ (14.0%), SSZ (6.2%), LEF (9.5%) or switched to SQ MTX (2.9%). The median (IQR) dose of oral MTX prior to switch to SQ was 15.0 (15.0, 20.0) mg/week and occurred at a median (IQR) of 322 (146,527) days.

Overall, 35.3% of the cohort subsequently initiated a biologic, mostly (90.3%) anti-TNF therapy. Of these individuals, 46.0% never used MTX at a dose of >= 20mg; 21.9% never used MTX at a dose of >= 15mg.  Among pts who used biologics after switch to SQ MTX, the median (IQR) interval of time between switching to SQ MTX and initiation of a biologic was 113 (65, 233) days. Among patients who increased dose or switched to SQ MTX or other nbDMARDs, (n=2,685) and after multivariable adjustment, there were no significant differences in subsequent biologic initiation between patients who switched to SQ MTX vs. added or switched to SSZ , LEF or HCQ.

Conclusion:

Titration to higher doses of oral MTX and use of SQ MTX preparations among RA patients is uncommon, even for patients who subsequently used biologics. Further work to optimize MTX in RA is warranted.


Disclosure:

J. R. Curtis,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

2,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

5;

F. Xie,
None;

J. Zhang,

Roche/Genentech,

2;

L. Chen,
None;

H. Yun,
None;

M. H. Schiff,

Antares biopharma, Abbvie, BMS, Pfizer, Amgen, Roche, UCB,

5;

T. Beukelman,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

2;

S. Ginsberg,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-oral-and-subcutaneous-mtx-in-a-commercially-insured-rheumatoid-arthritis-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology