ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2484

Use of Lean Six Sigma Methodology to Improve Time to Scheduling for New Patient Referrals to Rheumatology

Nicole Orzechowski1, Mary Bolg2, Rachael Bergeron1, Christopher Dorman2, Lauren Sanderson2, Miranda Stark2, Stacey Wilk2 and Tammy Gray3, 1Rheumatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 2Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 3White River Junction Family Practice, White River Junction, VT

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Lean, practice improvement and quality improvement, Referrals

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient satisfaction is an important driver of patient-centered care. The Section of Rheumatology was taking on average 5 days to contact and schedule new patients for consultation, with only 30-50% of patients rating the scheduling experience as excellent. Our practice was tasked by an organizational goal of Dartmouth-Hitchcock to reduce new referral scheduling time to 48-hours. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to develop a process to reduce referral scheduling time with a downstream impact of improving patient satisfaction.

Methods: An interdisciplinary team consisting of on-site clinicians, allied-health staff and practice managers, in addition to scheduling staff in our own practice and at referral practices met three times over a period of 6 weeks. Each meeting lasted between 4 and 7 hours. To understand the current workflow to allow for process improvement, we used the Lean Six Sigma DMAIC methodology (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control). Data was collected at baseline and at follow-up, including number of external referrals by month, number of days to triage referral, contact patient, and close referral, number of days from referral to appointment date, percent of 3rd calls that result in a scheduled appointment, and patient satisfaction on question regarding ease of scheduling.

Results: New referral scheduling dropped to less than two business days and the percent of patients rating the scheduling experience as excellent rose to 82% after process changes. Baseline process evaluation allowed us to identify considerable areas of waste including: a section-specific referral form; secretaries calling new patients up to three times prior to closing a referral when 3rd calls never resulted in an appointment being scheduled; a physician triage system resulting in batching of referrals and delays in scheduling; and secretaries hand-writing demographic information on a pre-appointment checklist.  Our methodology led to the implementation of three process changes: non-urgent referrals were scheduled with the first available provider to eliminate scheduling delay due to the triage process; an electronic smartphrase eliminated the need for handwritten information and was embedded into the electronic referral containing a prior pre-appointment checklist; elimination of requiring all clinical documentation to be on hand prior to appointment scheduling but incorporated a secretarial electronic checklist to ensure all documents arrived prior to the patient’s scheduled appointment.

Conclusion: Using quality improvement methodologies allowed the Section to initiate low-cost modifications to existing workflows to reduce overall scheduling times and improve patient satisfaction.


Disclosure: N. Orzechowski, None; M. Bolg, None; R. Bergeron, None; C. Dorman, None; L. Sanderson, None; M. Stark, None; S. Wilk, None; T. Gray, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Orzechowski N, Bolg M, Bergeron R, Dorman C, Sanderson L, Stark M, Wilk S, Gray T. Use of Lean Six Sigma Methodology to Improve Time to Scheduling for New Patient Referrals to Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-lean-six-sigma-methodology-to-improve-time-to-scheduling-for-new-patient-referrals-to-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-lean-six-sigma-methodology-to-improve-time-to-scheduling-for-new-patient-referrals-to-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology