ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2404

Use of Dmards after the Diagnosis of Cancers in Patients with RA

Young Bin Joo, Yune-Jung Park, Ki-Jo Kim and Kyung-Su Park, Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea, Republic of (South)

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: cancer and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), DMARDs

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster III: Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although there are many studies about the association of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with cancers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there are few reports about the use of DMARDs after the diagnosis of cancers. The aim of this study is to investigate use of DMARDs after the diagnosis of cancer in patients with RA.

Methods: We did retrospective chart review of 2,164 patients with RA who visited our rheumatology outpatient clinic between Jan 2008 and Feb 2017. We examined the use of DMARDs in RA patients who were diagnosed as having cancers after the onset of RA both at the time of the initial diagnosis of cancers and at the recent outpatient visit.

Results:

We found out 53 patients who were diagnosed with cancers after the onset of RA. At the time of initial diagnosis of cancer, the median age was 67 years (interquartile range; 53, 75) and disease duration was 4.5 years (2.7, 4.5). Female was 37 (70%), seropositive patients were 47 (89%), and those with joint erosions were 28 (53%).

The most frequent cancer was lung cancer (n=12), followed by stomach cancer (n=6) and cervical cancer (n=6). Twenty-five (47%) received surgery, 20 (38%) received chemotherapy, and 8 (15%) received conservative treatment.

At the time of initial diagnosis of cancers, DMARDs were stopped in 22 patients (42%), but resumed in 15 within mean 1.5 months. In 17 patients (32%), DMARDs was changed and 11 of the 17 patients received monotherapy, among which hydroxychloroquine was most frequently used (n=5). Fourteen patients (26%) received the same DMARDs used before the diagnosis of cancer.

At the recent outpatient visit (after the mean follow-up of 2.7 years), conventional DMARDs were used in 32 patients (60%) and biologics in 7 (13%). Fourteen patients (27%) were not on the DMARDs treatment. When it comes to conventional DMARDs, monotherapy was used in 12 patients and combination DMARDs in 20. Methotrexate monotherapy (n=6/32) and the combination of leflunomide and hydroxychloroquine (n=6/32) were the most prevalent DMARDs.

After adjusting for confounding factors, chemotherapy was associated with no DMARDs treatment at a recent outpatient visit (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-19.9). Interestingly, all the RA patients diagnosed with hematologic cancer (n=2) were not on the DMARD treatment.

Conclusion: In RA patients with cancer, main treatment patterns at the initial diagnosis of cancer were discontinuation of DMARDs or change to monotherapy mainly hydroxychloroquine. After the mean follow-up of 2.7 years, methotrexate monotherapy, combination of leflunomide and hydroxychloroquine, and biologics were used with nearly equal frequencies. Chemotherapy was associated with no DMARDs treatment at a recent outpatient visit.


Disclosure: Y. B. Joo, None; Y. J. Park, None; K. J. Kim, None; K. S. Park, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Joo YB, Park YJ, Kim KJ, Park KS. Use of Dmards after the Diagnosis of Cancers in Patients with RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-dmards-after-the-diagnosis-of-cancers-in-patients-with-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-dmards-after-the-diagnosis-of-cancers-in-patients-with-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology