ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 196

Uptake Of The American College Of Rheumatology’s Rheumatology Clinical Registry: Quality Measure Summary Data

Jinoos Yazdany1, Salahuddin Kazi2, Rachel Myslinski3 and Melissa Francisco4, 1Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 3Practice, Advocacy, & Quality, American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, GA, 4Registries & Health Informatics, American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Quality, quality measures and quality reporting

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The RCR provides ACR members with an infrastructure for quality reporting related to rheumatoid arthritis, gout, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and drug safety. Currently in its fourth year of operation, the RCR contains data on over 32,000 patients. 

Here we report the uptake of the RCR by U.S. rheumatologists and performance on quality measures regarding functional status, disease modifying drug (DMARD) use, tuberculosis screening, prognosis, and disease activity assessment for RA patients in 2011 and 2012.

Methods: Data derive from retrospective medical records abstractions performed by providers and/or designated practice staff for a sample of patients seen by rheumatologists. Reporters submit data on quality measures via a secure, web-based registry system.  Patients included in the denominator of all quality measures are >18 years of age with a diagnosis of RA who are receiving treatment by the reporting rheumatology provider. Additional details of each measure are listed in Table 1.  We report the mean performance on each quality measure, defined as percentage of eligible patients receiving recommended care.

Results: Table 1 summarizes performance on RA measures reported through the RCR. From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, 301 rheumatology providers in 138 practices submitted data on 9154 encounters with RA patients. Comparative data are provided for the previous reporting period. These data summarize 8096 encounters with RA patients submitted by 257 rheumatology providers in 143 practices from January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2011. Reporting providers practice in sites ranging from solo offices to large academic medical centers.

Table 1. Performance on RA Measures Assessed through the RCR

 

CY2011

CY2012

 

Patients (N)

QM Performance Rate

Patients (N)

QM Performance Rate

Disease activity assessed at least once   within 12 months, using a standardized descriptive or numeric scale or   composite index, and classified as low, moderate or high

8075

43.3%

6485

54.4%

Functional status assessment performed   at least once within 12 months, and documented

using a standardized descriptive or   numeric scale, standardized questionnaire, or notation of assessment of the   impact of RA on patient activities of daily living

8077

70.5%

6485

86.6%

Patient prescribed, dispensed, or   administered at least one ambulatory prescription for a DMARD within 12   months

7808

97.9%

6485

86.6%

Documentation of TB screening performed   and results interpreted within 6 months prior to receiving first course DMARD

1650

73.6%

1048

92.9%

Assessment and classification of disease   prognosis at least once within 12 months

7771

49.5%

6441

73.4%

Conclusion:

Performance rates increased on four out of five measures from CY2011 to CY2012. Based on preliminary results, the ACR plans to complete in-depth analyses of both measure and population performance.


Disclosure:

J. Yazdany,
None;

S. Kazi,
None;

R. Myslinski,
None;

M. Francisco,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/uptake-of-the-american-college-of-rheumatologys-rheumatology-clinical-registry-quality-measure-summary-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology