ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1462

Unmasking The Tolerability Of Methotrexate In Patients With Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Retrospective Review Of Discontinuation From a Large UK Cohort

Andra Negoescu1, Elena Nikiphorou2, Anshuman P. Malaviya3, Andrew Badcock3, John D. Fitzpatrick3,4, Calum T. Goudie3,4 and Andrew J. Ostor3, 1Rheumatology, Rheumatology Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 4University of Cambridge Medical School, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adverse events, methotrexate (MTX), Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tolerance

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  

Due to its efficacy and perceived safety, methotrexate (MTX) has become the foundation disease-modifying drug for rheumatoid (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) however its tolerability has not been a focus of research. The objective of our study therefore was to analyse this by identifying RA and PsA patients in whom MTX was discontinued and to determine the reasons for this. We were specifically interested in how long patients remained on MTX prior to withdrawal.

Methods:  

A retrospective review of our institutions electronic database was undertaken to identify all RA and PsA patients who had been prescribed MTX.  Patients who had discontinued MTX were then identified from both the electronic and paper-based records and the reasons for this were categorised. The duration of MTX treatment was then assessed in those who had stopped treatment due to intolerability. 

Results:

762 RA and 193  PsA patients had received MTX. In those the DMARD had been stopped in 260 (34%) RA patients and 71 (36%) PsA patients with intolerability cited as the most common reasons for this (60% and 63% in RA and PsA respectively).  Haematological abnormalities (leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) were reported more frequently in RA (11.5% vs 6.8% p<0.05) and liver enzyme abnormalities more common in PsA (27% vs 12%; p<0.05). The most common symptoms resulting in MTX withdrawal were nausea, shortness of breath, feeling generally unwell, headache and fatigue.  Other reasons for stopping MTX included: ineffectiveness, planned pregnancy, lifestyle choice and disease remission. The median duration of MTX treatment was 10 months in both groups, mean duration 21 and 18.6 months in RA and PsA groups respectively (Range: 0.25 – 122.25 months for RA, 1.00-79.25 months for PsA).  The mode was at 3 months for RA and 1 month for PsA. See figure 1 for duration of MTX treatment.

Conclusion:

Overall one third of patients with RA and PsA stop MTX most commonly due to poor tolerability.  In the context of chronic disease the median duration of treatment is short (10 months). Clinicians need to be aware of the frequency of MTX intolerability, and that this may occur early in the treatment cycle, and to alter therapy accordingly to optimise outcomes.  

Figure 1. Duration of MTX therapy in patients who stopped treatment due to side effects


Disclosure:

A. Negoescu,
None;

E. Nikiphorou,
None;

A. P. Malaviya,
None;

A. Badcock,
None;

J. D. Fitzpatrick,
None;

C. T. Goudie,
None;

A. J. Ostor,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/unmasking-the-tolerability-of-methotrexate-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-and-psoriatic-arthritis-a-retrospective-review-of-discontinuation-from-a-large-uk-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology