ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0217

Understanding Treatment Goals and Factors Influencing Decisions About Clinical Trial Participation in Lupus Patients from Diverse Backgrounds

Joy Buie1, Safoah Agyemang1 and Joan Merrill2, 1Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 2Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City 73104, OK

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, Randomized Trial, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: With many emerging treatments in development for lupus, clinical trial recruitment has become increasingly difficult. Growing appreciation of patient input into trial design may be of  value in removing impediments to trial participation and improving the safety and well-being of participants. The current study examined treatment goals and factors influencing decisions about trial participation in patients with lupus from diverse racial backgrounds.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed to assess priority considerations affecting trial participation and preferences in trial designs. Delegates attending the 2024 Advocacy Summit of the Lupus Foundation of America were invited to participate. Among the delegates were 120 patients with lupus, including 62 African American, 45 White, 9 Asian, and 4 participants of other descent. The study population was predominantly female  (91.6%) with mean age of 44.9 years (range 16-71), reflective of a typical trial population. There were significant variations in disease manifestations and treatment priorities among the respondents (Table 1).

Results: Data analysis was completed using signed rank or Wilcoxon Rank tests (non-normal distributions) or paired t test where normality was satisfied. The study identified predominant goals of treatment including improved daily functioning (81.7%), and long-term benefits (76.7%). Only 38.3% of respondents chose convenience of dosing as important while 75.8% cited pain relief as a priority. African Americans and to a lesser degree White patients prioritized pain relief and daily functioning over dosing convenience (p< .001, p=.003, respectively). A subset of 95 patients reported a range of factors affecting trial participation. Positive influences on trial participation based on a 1-10 scale with 10 being the most important included access to new treatments (mean score 8.51) and contribution to medical science (mean score 8.49). Negative influences included the potential for side effects (mean score 8.33) and cost of travel/childcare (mean score 7.32). Preferences in trial design highlighted the importance of flexible visit schedules (mean score 8.88) and the concept of guaranteed access to the investigational treatment post-trial (mean score 9.25). Compared to Whites, African American patients expressed greater concern about the risk of receiving placebo when participating in a clinical trial (p=0.031) and  showed preference for a trial design where all patients receive active drug early in the trial followed by randomized withdrawal that would only occur when a patient is feeling well (p= 0.002).

Conclusion: Asking patients what factors might improve their confidence in choosing to participate or increase the feasibility to do so is critical for addressing unmet needs in clinical trial recruitment. Receiving placebo as well as risk for side effects may each be impacting on willingness to participate in trials. These findings point to a need for solutions such as trials with early access to the active treatment and/or improved communications about side effect risks and risk management. Practical impediments to trial participation such as travel costs and childcare are also important and could potentially be addressed.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: J. Buie: None; S. Agyemang: None; J. Merrill: AbbVie, 1, 2, Alexion, 1, 2, Alumis, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, Aurinia, 1, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 1, 2, Genentech, 1, 2, Gilead, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 2, 5, Kezar, 1, 2, Lilly, 1, 2, Merck, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Provention, 1, 2, Remegen, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, 2, Takeda, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2, Zenas, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Buie J, Agyemang S, Merrill J. Understanding Treatment Goals and Factors Influencing Decisions About Clinical Trial Participation in Lupus Patients from Diverse Backgrounds [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-treatment-goals-and-factors-influencing-decisions-about-clinical-trial-participation-in-lupus-patients-from-diverse-backgrounds/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-treatment-goals-and-factors-influencing-decisions-about-clinical-trial-participation-in-lupus-patients-from-diverse-backgrounds/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology