ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2362

Understanding Patients’ Perceptions of Gout

Kelly Gavigan1, Kayla Jordan2, Alexa Meara3 and W. Benjamin Nowell1, 1Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 2University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 3Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Gout and patient outcomes, PRO

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II: Patient Perspectives

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Past research has shown that patients’ (pts’) knowledge of their disease influences health-related behavior. The objective of this study is to explore gout pts’ knowledge of the disease, treatment options and chronic management, as well as identify their sources of health information. With only half of gout pts adherent to gout medications, our goal is to guide the development of gout support tools by identifying gaps in pt knowledge.

Methods: We developed an online survey to gather information about pts’ knowledge, beliefs and perceptions of gout. Pt members of the ArthritisPower registry or CreakyJoints community were asked to participate if they had a self-reported diagnosis of gout. Pts completed six (Pain Interference, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Physical Function, RAPID3, Gout Flare) pt-reported outcome measures. Pearson’s Chi-squared test was used to assess significance. Open-ended questions were analyzed with LIWC2015, an automated text analysis program.

Results: To date, 103 participants completed the survey; 55% were female, 53% had an annual income >=$50,000, 84% white and average age of 56 years (range 32 – 80). 85% believe uric acid causes gout, however, only 50% believe uric acid-controlling medication is the best way to manage the disease. Additionally, 81% believe gout is best managed by diet change. Pts currently experiencing a gout flare were more likely to believe gout is best managed with NSAIDs than those not experiencing a flare (37% vs 16%; p=0.02) (Table). The qualitative results showed that non-flaring pts tended to use risk-oriented language while flaring pts used reward-oriented language (Figure). Pts receive information about gout from online health education sites and their PCP at similar rates (60% and 53%, respectively). Non-flaring pts preferred to get information online more than flaring pts (63% vs. 44%; p=0.06). Men were more likely to seek information from their rheumatologist than women (28% vs 13%; p=0.05).

Conclusion: The survey shows variation in beliefs about gout and in words used to describe gout by gender, age and gout flare status. Food and lifestyle misconceptions remain a large component of pts’ conversations surrounding gout. The majority of pts currently believe gout can be managed through diet rather than prescribed medications, suggesting insufficient pt knowledge about gout. While many pts prefer to access information online, there is still an underutilization of rheumatologists. Developing decisional support tools available at health care offices may help increase knowledge about gout and improve gout health care outcomes.


Disclosure: K. Gavigan, Global Healthy Living Foundation, 3; K. Jordan, None; A. Meara, None; W. B. Nowell, GlaxoSmithKline, 1,Merck & Co., 1,Pfizer, Inc., 1, 2,AbbVie Inc., 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2,Eli Lilly and Co., 1, 2,Janssen, 1,Novartis, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gavigan K, Jordan K, Meara A, Nowell WB. Understanding Patients’ Perceptions of Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-patients-perceptions-of-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-patients-perceptions-of-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology