ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2157

Understanding Differences Between Black and White Patients’ Reactions to New Treatment

Liana Fraenkel1, Richard L. Street Jr.2 and Ellen Peters3, 1Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT, 2Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 3Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ethnic studies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects: Psychology/Social Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Numerous studies have found that Black patients are more risk averse than their White counterparts. In clinical practice, patients make judgments based on oral information provided to them by their physicians; yet most studies have examined patients’ perceptions using written information. The objective of this study was to examine the factors underlying Black and White patients’ treatment preference after hearing about a new medication described to them orally by a physician.

Methods: Subjects with a connective tissue disease, recruited from University-affiliated rheumatology practices, listened to a professionally-recorded standardized description of a medication. Prior to hearing the description, demographic and clinical characteristics (by self-report), trust in physicians and subjective numeracy (using validated scales) were ascertained. Helpfulness of the proposed treatment, fear about the side effects, and willingness to take the medication were measured using 7-point numeric rating scales. Kendall Tau b correlation coefficients between subjects’ characteristics and their perceptions related to the medication are reported.

Results: We interviewed 284 subjects: 71 Black [mean (SD) age = 50.4 (13.5); 83% female] and 213 White [mean (SD) age 57.4 (14.7); 73% female]. Increased helpfulness and less fear of side effects were associated with increased willingness to take the medication among Black (r= 0.60, p<0.0001 and r= -0.22, p=0.02, respectively) and White subjects (r= 0.49, p<.0001 and r= -0.36, p<.0001, respectively). Older age was associated with decreased willingness to take the medication among White subjects only. Health status, trust and subjective numeracy did not have a direct effect on willingness to take the medication in either Black or White subjects. However, higher subjective numeracy was associated with increased perceived helpfulness in White subjects (r= 0.125, p=0.005), while greater trust was associated with increased perceived helpfulness (r= 0.20, p=0.02) in Black subjects. Poor health status was associated with greater fear (r=0.247, p=0.01) in Black subjects only. Helpfulness and fear were inversely correlated in White (r= -0.126, p<.0001), but not Black subjects (r= 0.007, p=0.9).

Conclusion: After hearing about a medication, Black subjects’ treatment preferences were indirectly influenced by self-reported health status and trust and directly influenced by perceived helpfulness of the proposed treatment and fear of the side effects. In contrast, White subjects’ treatment preferences were indirectly influenced by numeracy and directly influenced by age, perceived helpfulness and fear of the side effects. An inverse relationship between perceived helpfulness and fear (indicative of a confounding effect) was observed among White, but not Black subjects. The factors that influence how Black and White patients respond to information about medications differ.

Description: C:Userslf57DesktopModel.jpg


Disclosure:

L. Fraenkel,
None;

R. L. Street Jr.,
None;

E. Peters,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-differences-between-black-and-white-patients-reactions-to-new-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology