ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1045

Under Reporting Of Cataracts In Randomised Controlled Trials Investigating The Use Of Systemic Glucocorticoids In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rachel J. Black1,2 and William G. Dixon3, 1Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 3The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services II & III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Oral glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is used in more than half of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Cataracts are a recognised treatment-related side effect of GC use.  However, the magnitude of the risk, its relationship with dose, or whether screening for cataracts should be undertaken in patients on GC therapy is not clear. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of cataracts in the active and placebo arms of RCTs of systemic GC therapy in patients with RA. Because of early concerns about possible under-reporting in the trials, a second aim was to compare the observed incidence in the RCTs to the incidence of cataracts in the general population.

Methods: : Twenty two RCTs of systemic GC therapy in patients with RA were reassessed to identify incident cataracts in the placebo and treatment arms. The number of person years at risk (pyr) and the resultant incidence rates/ 1000pyr were calculated for the combined RCT population, then for the GC and control groups separately. The incidence rate ratio for GC use was calculated using Poisson regression. Two large observational studies (The Beaver Dam Eye Study and The Blue Mountains Eye Study) reporting the incidence of cataract in the general population were identified. Both studies reported the age and gender-specific cumulative incidence of cataracts over 5 years and 10 years. The mean of the incidence rates across the two studies was used to generate a general population incidence rate for the age-specific strata.  Indirect standardisation was used to calculate the expected number of cases in the RCTs, were the RCT patients to have had the same incidence rate as the general population.  A standardised incidence ratio was then calculated using the number of observed and expected cases.

Results: In the 22 RCTs, there were 2250 patients with a mean age of 56 years (weighted by duration of follow up), contributing 3764pyr.  There were 13 cases of cataract reported in 3 of the 22 RCTs, giving an overall incidence rate of 3.5 per 1000pyr. The RCTs contributed 1884pyr to the GC group and 1880pyr to the control group. There were 7 cases of cataract reported in the GC group and 6 in the control group, generating incidence rates of 3.7 and 3.2 / 1000pyr in the GC and control group, respectively. The incidence rate ratio for GC use was 1.16 (95%CI 0.39 – 3.46). Using the general population incidence for patients aged 55-64 years of 46.7 per 1000pyr, the expected number of cataracts was 176. This generates a standardised incidence ratio of 0.07 (95%CI 0.03 – 0.21).

Conclusion: The incidence of cataracts was 16% higher in GC-treated compared to control patients with RA using all available RCTs. However the lack of precision (wide confidence intervals) due to small numbers means that this calculation is inconclusive. The observed number of cataracts was around 15 times lower than expected in both arms, suggesting huge under-reporting. Such under-reporting results in low confidence of any measured risk from these studies emphasising the need for well designed observational studies and better reporting of steroid-side effects in future RCTS.


Disclosure:

R. J. Black,

Supported jointly by an educational research grant by Australian Rheumatology Association and Roche Products Pty Limited.,

2;

W. G. Dixon,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/under-reporting-of-cataracts-in-randomised-controlled-trials-investigating-the-use-of-systemic-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology