ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 282

Ultrasound Is More Sensitive Compared to Conventional Radiography to Detect Joint Erosions in ACPA-positive Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain

Michael Ziegelasch1, Emma Eloff 2, Hilde Hammer 3, Jan Cedergren 4, Klara Martinsson 5, Åsa Reckner 4, Thomas Skogh 2 and Alf Kastbom 2, 1Department of Rheumatology, Linkoping, Sweden, 2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping, Sweden, 3Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway, 4Rheumatology Department, Linkoping, Sweden, 5Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and radiography, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Imaging Of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Circulating anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are associated with an increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in patients with erosive disease. We previously showed that erosions detected by ultrasound predict arthritis development in ACPA-positive patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. We now aimed to compare ultrasound with conventional radiography to detect joint erosions during 2 years follow-up of ACPA positive patients with MSK pain.

Methods: We prospectively followed 82 ACPA-positive patients with MSK pain without arthritis at baseline clinical examination. Ultrasound at baseline and after 2 years assessed joint erosions, defined as intraarticular discontinuity of the bone surface visible in 2 planes, in 36 joints in hands and feet. Radiographs of hands and feet were taken at baseline and after 2 years, and evaluated by experienced radiologists according to clinical routine. In cases where erosions had been identified by the radiologist, and in all cases with indistinct findings as well as the radiographs of all patients with erosions by ultrasound, the radiographs were reevaluated by an experienced rheumatologist to confirm presence of erosions. We used Fisher’s exact test to compare the prevalence of erosions as evaluated by ultrasound and radiography.

Results: Baseline joint erosion(s) were detected in 13 (16%) patients by ultrasound and in 3 (4%) patients by conventional radiography (p=0.016, Fig. 1). After 2 years follow-up, 30 of the patients (37%) had developed clinical arthritis. By ultrasound, erosion(s) were detected in 16 patients (19%) and in 3 (4%) by conventional radiography (p=0.018, Fig. 1). During follow-up, the total number of ultrasound erosions had increased from 16 to 20, while radiographic erosions had increased from 3 to 5 (p >0.05). Development of new erosions at 2 years occurred in 8 patients (12%) as evaluated by ultrasound, and in one patient (1%) by radiography (p=0.013) among patients without baseline erosions (by corresponding imaging techniques). In 5 out of the 13 patients (38%) with baseline ultrasound erosions, no further abnormality was detected at 2 years. The corresponding finding concerning radiographic erosion was made in 1 patient.

Conclusion: Ultrasound is more sensitive compared to conventional radiography to detect erosive abnormalities during follow-up of an ACPA-positive at-risk population. To some extent, erosive joint abnormalities show dynamic, and possibly reversible, features in very early phases of RA.

Figure 1: Number of patients with joint erosions according to ultrasound and/or conventional radiography in a cohort of 82 ACPA-positive patients with musculoskeletal pain.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasound-is-more-sensitive-compared-to-conventional-radiography-to-detect-joint-erosions-in-acpa-positive-patients-with-musculoskeletal-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology