ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 117

Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome – Comparison of Different Methods to Determine Median Nerve Volume and Value of Power Doppler Sonography

Christian Dejaco1, Martin Stradner2, Dorothea Zauner2, Werner Seel3, Nicole E. Simmet3, Alexander Klammer2, Kerstin Brickmann2, Judith Gretler2, Florentine Moazedi-Fürst2, Rene Thonhofer2, Rusmir Husic2, Josef Hermann2 and Stefan Quasthoff3, 1Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria, 3Neurology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, diagnosis, pain and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: Ultrasound, Nuclear Medicine and Fluorescence Imaging

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Routine use of sonography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is hampered by the lack of consensus regarding anatomical landmarks for the measurement of median nerve volume and difficulty of determining thresholds for abnormal median nerve swelling. This study was conduced to compare ultrasound measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at different anatomical landmarks and to analyze the value of Power Doppler (PD) signals within the median nerve

Methods: We prospectively studied 135 consecutive patients with suspected CTS undergoing clinical and electrophysiological evaluation at two subsequent visits within three months. Final diagnosis of CTS was established by the evaluating neurologist based on findings from these conventional methods at both visits. Median nerve sonography was performed by two rheumatologists using a GE Logiq E9. CSA was measured at 5 different levels at forearm and wrist; and CSA wrist to forearm ratios or differences were calculated. Intra-neural PD-signals were semiquantitatively graded (scale 0–3). Diagnostic values of different ultrasound methods were compared by receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curves using SPSS (v19.0).

Results: CTS was diagnosed in 111 (45.5%) wrists; 84 (34.4%) had no CTS and 49 (20.1%) were possible CTS cases. Diagnostic values were comparable for all sonographic methods to determine median nerve swelling with AUCs ranging from 0.75 to 0.84. Thresholds of 9.8 and 13.8 mm2 for the largest CSA of the median nerve yielded a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 92%, respectively. In cases of mild median nerve swelling the relative increase in CSA between the entrapment area and forearm provided additional diagnostic certainty (AUCs from 0.60 to 0.67). Increased vascularity as indicated by a PD-score ≥2 had a specificity of 90% for the diagnosis of CTS. Reliability of sonographic median nerve volumetry was good as indicated by an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95).

Conclusion: Sonographic assessment of median nerve swelling and tissue vascularity at different anatomical landmarks allows for a reliable confirmation of the diagnosis in patients with clinically suspected CTS


Disclosure:

C. Dejaco,
None;

M. Stradner,
None;

D. Zauner,
None;

W. Seel,
None;

N. E. Simmet,
None;

A. Klammer,
None;

K. Brickmann,
None;

J. Gretler,
None;

F. Moazedi-Fürst,
None;

R. Thonhofer,
None;

R. Husic,
None;

J. Hermann,
None;

S. Quasthoff,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasound-for-diagnosis-of-carpal-tunnel-syndrome-comparison-of-different-methods-to-determine-median-nerve-volume-and-value-of-power-doppler-sonography/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology