ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2243

Ultrasound Enthesitis Responsiveness versus Clinical Enthesitis Responsiveness: Week 52 Results of an Exploratory Analysis from a Phase 3b Study in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Maria Antonietta D'Agostino1, Corine Gaillez2, Georg Schett3, Maarten Boers4, Philippe Carron5, Peter Mandl6, JAVIER ROSA7, Esperanza Naredo8, Catherine Bakewell9, Weibin Bao10 and Philip Conaghan11, 1Division of Rheumatology - Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy, 2Novartis Pharma AG, Croissy Sur Seine, France, 3Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, 4Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amersfoort, Netherlands, 5UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium, 6Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 7Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 8Hospital Fundación, Madrid, Spain, 9Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, 10Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Hanover, NJ, 11University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2227–2256) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment: SpA Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Enthesitis is a key clinical and imaging hallmark in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). ULTIMATE (NCT02662985) demonstrated responsiveness of ultrasound (US) detected synovitis and enthesitis in PsA and confirmed rapid and long-lasting benefits of secukinumab (SEC) through 52 weeks.1,2 Little is known about the relationship between US-detected enthesitis vs clinical enthesitis over time. We evaluated the responsiveness of US enthesitis to SEC over 52 weeks and the correlation with clinical response of enthesitis.

Methods: This was a 52-week study with a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, a 12-week open-label (OL) treatment period and a 6-month extension period. Patients with ≥1 clinical enthesitis site, defined by the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index,were randomized to weekly SEC (300 or 150 mg according to severity of skin psoriasis) or placebo. Placebo patients switched to OL SEC at Week 12 (‘placebo-SEC’). Enthesitis was assessed by Power Doppler (PD) performed bilaterally across 6 sites (enthesitis-level), and at patient level with the novel global Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) enthesitis score, which included 2 definitions of activity: definition 1 combinedB-mode morphological abnormalities (0–1) and PD vascularization abnormalities (0–3); definition 2 focused on PD signal alone (0–3). Clinical response was assessed by SPARCC enthesitis index (0–16). We report observed data on the distribution of US and clinical enthesitis, enthesitis resolution over 52 weeks, and the correlation between US and clinical enthesitis from baseline (BL) to Week 12.

Results: Overall, 166 patients were randomized; 90% (75/83) in the SEC group and 83% (69/83) in the placebo-SEC group completed 52 weeks. The mean number of clinical enthesitis sites at BL was 4 in both the SEC and placebo groups. Mean (SD) global OMERACT enthesitis scores were 6 (4.7) and 5 (3.2) (definition 1) and 3 (3.4) and 3 (1.6) (definition 2), for SEC and placebo-SEC, respectively. The proportion of patients with US-detected and clinical enthesitis decreased for most enthesitis sites in both treatment groups from BL to Week 24 and remained stable up to Week 52; definition 2 generally performed more closely to SPARCC clinical index than definition 1 (Table 1). According to the global OMERACT enthesitis score (definition 1 or 2), resolution of enthesitis was observed in a higher proportion of patients in the SEC vs placebo-SEC group at Week 12; the difference between SEC and placebo-SEC was similar at Week 52 (Table 2). No correlations were observed between the OMERACT score (definition 1 or 2) and SPARCC index regarding change from BL to Week 12 (Table 3).

Conclusion: A long-term stable response was observed with SEC and placebo-SEC in both US and clinical enthesitis up to Week 52. We found no correlation between US and clinically detected enthesitis, likely because the former assesses inflammation based on morphological/functional tissue changes while the SPARCC index evaluates inflammation based on tenderness of the entheseal site.

References:
1. D’Agostino MA, et al [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9).
2. D’Agostino MA, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022;61(5):1867–1876.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: M. D'Agostino: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; C. Gaillez: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 11, Novartis, 3, 11; G. Schett: None; M. Boers: Celltrion, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6; P. Carron: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; P. Mandl: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, 6, Celgene, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, 6, Merck/MSD, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Roche, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; J. ROSA: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6; E. Naredo: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Celgene, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6, UCB, 6; C. Bakewell: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; W. Bao: Novartis, 3, 11; P. Conaghan: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, Genascense, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Grunenthal, 2, Janssen, 2, Levicept, 2, Merck/MSD, 2, Moebius Medical, 2, Novartis, 2, 6, Stryker, 2, Takeda, 2, TrialSpark, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

D'Agostino M, Gaillez C, Schett G, Boers M, Carron P, Mandl P, ROSA J, Naredo E, Bakewell C, Bao W, Conaghan P. Ultrasound Enthesitis Responsiveness versus Clinical Enthesitis Responsiveness: Week 52 Results of an Exploratory Analysis from a Phase 3b Study in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasound-enthesitis-responsiveness-versus-clinical-enthesitis-responsiveness-week-52-results-of-an-exploratory-analysis-from-a-phase-3b-study-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasound-enthesitis-responsiveness-versus-clinical-enthesitis-responsiveness-week-52-results-of-an-exploratory-analysis-from-a-phase-3b-study-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology