ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2881

Ultrasonographic Salivary Glands Response To Rituximab In Primary Sjögren Syndrome Patients In the Tolerance and Efficacy Of Rituximab In Primary Sjogren Syndrome Study Is Not Associated With The Anatomopathology Changes

Sandrine Jousse-Joulin1, Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec2, Divi Cornec3, Simon Gestin4, Luc Bressollette5, Thierry Marhadour6, Jacques-Olivier Pers7, Emmanuel Nowak8 and Alain Saraux9, 1Rheumatology, Brest university medical school, EA 2216, UBO and CHU de la Cavale Blanche,, Brest, France, 2Department of rheumatology and unit of immunology (EA2216), Brest Occidentale university, Brest, France, 3Department of rheumatology, Brest Occidentale University, Brest, France, 4Vascular medicine, CHU Brest, Brest, France, 5Department of ultrasound, Brest Occidentale University, Brest, France, 6Rheumatology, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France, 7Unit of immunology, EA 2216, Brest Occidentale University, Brest, France, 8CIC, CHU Brest, Brest, France, 9Department of rheumatology and unit of immunology (EA 2216), CHU Brest et Université Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rituximab and ultrasonography, Sjogren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome: Clinical Advances

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of Rituximab (RTX) in active pSS patients in France (TEARS study) and we evaluated, in a single centre (Brest, France), the echostructural and vascularisation changes in this population.

Methods:

The TEARS study included pSS patients with scores above 50 mm on at least two of four visual analog scales (VASs) evaluating dryness, pain, fatigue, and global disease. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to RTX (1 g at weeks 0 and 2) or placebo (PBO). Patient had recent-onset (<10 years) biologically active pSS and/or systemic pSS. 28 pSS patients had ultrasonographic examination and a salivary gland biopsy before the first infusion (placebo or RTX) and at 24 weeks follow up. Both parotid and submandibular glands were assessed. The echostructure of each gland was scored using a semi quantitative scoring (0 to 4) (figure 1). We also evaluated the size of each glands and the vascularisation using the resistive index of the transverse facial artery of the parotid glands before and after stimulation with lemon juice. Concerning the echostructural scoring of each gland, we considered an improvement if the score of the glands was improved by one point or more and the comparison between the RTX and placebo group were obtained using the Fisher’s exact test. Difference of size (mm) and resistive index before and after treatment (RTX or PBO) were evaluated using the non parametric Wilcoxon test.

Results:

Parotid echostructural scoring was improved in 50% of pSS patients in the RTX group versus 7% in the placebo group (p=0.03). Table 1 shows the changes of grade before and after treatment in both RTX and PBO groups. The US submandibular scoring was also improved in 35% of pSS patients in the RTX group compared to 16% in the placebo but the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.16). There were no changes concerning the size of each gland in RTX or placebo groups (figure 2). Regarding the modifications between week 0 and week 24 of lemon stimulation response, measured by resistive index variation before and after stimulation, the two groups were not different. 35 had a Chisholm score evaluation before and after treatment, 16 a focus score evaluation and 28 an ultrasound evaluation. At least one parotid gland had an improvement in 2/14 in the P group versus 7/14 in the R group. At least one submandibular gland had an improvement in 1/14 in the PBO group versus 7/14 in the R group (p: 0.03). Focus score was lower after treatment in 3/10 in both PBO and R groups. Similarly, 3/18 had an improvement of their Chisholm score in the P group versus 2/17 in the R group (NS). The concordance between both submandibular and parotid glands US score and focus score was low (kappa<0.1).

Conclusion:

In our pSS population treated by RTX or PBO, ultrasound evaluation showed a more important improvement of the echostructure of the salivary glands in treated patients than in the placebo group. In contrast, RTX did not modify neither sizes of the salivary glands nor vascularisation inside the glands. Ultrasonographic improvement was not associated to anatomopathologic changes of the minor salivary gland labial biopsy.


Disclosure:

S. Jousse-Joulin,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5;

V. Devauchelle-Pensec,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5;

D. Cornec,
None;

S. Gestin,
None;

L. Bressollette,
None;

T. Marhadour,
None;

J. O. Pers,
None;

E. Nowak,
None;

A. Saraux,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasonographic-salivary-glands-response-to-rituximab-in-primary-sjogren-syndrome-patients-in-the-tolerance-and-efficacy-of-rituximab-in-primary-sjogren-syndrome-study-is-not-associated-with-the/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology