ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 931

Ultra-Low Doses of Rituximab for Retreatment of RA: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

Lise Verhoef1, Nathan den Broeder 1, Rogier Thurlings 2, Willemijn van der Laan 1, Wilfred van der Weele 3, Marc Kok 4, Hein Bernelot Moens 5, Thasia Woodworth 6, Bart van den Bemt 1, Frank van den Hoogen 1 and Alfons den Broeder 1, 1Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 5Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, Netherlands, 6University of California, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S109: RA – Treatments II: Novel Treatments for RA (927–932)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Rituximab is an effective treatment for patients with RA. 1000mg (1×1000mg or 2×500mg) has similar six-month efficacy as the registered dose of 2×1000mg.(1) Based on several case reports and a case series even lower doses might be sufficient for maintenance treatment, potentially improving safety and decreasing costs.(2) The objective of this study was to compare effectiveness of rituximab retreatment with ultra-low doses (1×500mg or 1×200mg) to standard low dose (1×1000mg).

Methods: A six-month double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (REDO study (3)) was performed in five centers in the Netherlands. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis responding well to rituximab (based on DAS28-CRP< 2.9 or clinical judgement) were randomized (1:2:2) to 1×1000mg, 1×500mg or 1×200mg rituximab respectively. DAS28-CRP and peripheral CD19+ B-cells were measured at baseline, three and six months. Primary analysis (per protocol with last observation carried forward (LOCF)) consisted of a hierarchical testing procedure comparing ultra-low doses (1×500mg at three and six months, then 1×200mg at three and six months) to 1×1000mg using a non-inferiority margin of 0.6 (on DAS28-CRP). DAS28-CRP change of study groups was compared using linear regression, adjusted for baseline DAS28-CRP, RF/ACPA status and concomitant csDMARD use. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were done similarly (including all cases without LOCF).

Results: The projected inclusion was met (n=142, table 1a). In both ultra-low dose groups two patients received an extra dose of 1000mg rituximab due to a flare. The 500mg dose was non-inferior to 1000mg at three months (-0.07 (95% CI -0.41 to 0.27)), but not at six months (0.29 (95% CI -0.08 to 0.65). The 200mg dose was non-inferior to 1000mg at both time points. Because of our pre-defined hierarchical testing, non-inferiority could not formally be inferred for the 200mg dose. ITT analyses showed non-inferiority for all comparisons. Mean DAS28-CRP scores remained low in all groups throughout the study, and B-cell counts decreased similarly at three months (figure 1). The incidence density of infections was lower in the 500mg group (rate ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.83, p=0.01)) and in the 200mg group (rate ratio 0.44 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.88, p=0.02)) compared to the 1000mg group (table 1b).

Conclusion: Non-inferiority of retreatment with 1×500mg or 1×200mg rituximab versus 1×1000mg after 6 months could not formally be established. However, ultra-low doses appear similarly effective in the majority of RA patients, judged by non-inferiority of ITT analyses, DAS28-CRP course over time and B-cell results, with a better safety profile and possibly slightly more co-medication.

References
1. Bredemeier et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(10):1801-5
2. Shenoy et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(suppl 10).
3. den Broeder et al. Trials. 2017;30;18(1):403

Table 1

Figure 1


Disclosure: L. Verhoef, None; N. den Broeder, None; R. Thurlings, Roche, 9, AbbVie, 9, Cellgene, 9; W. van der Laan, None; W. van der Weele, None; M. Kok, None; H. Bernelot Moens, None; T. Woodworth, None; B. van den Bemt, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Biogen, 8, BMS, 2, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sandoz, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; F. van den Hoogen, AbbVie, 5, Actelion, 2, Amgen, 8, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Celltrion Healthcare, 5, 8, Corbus, 8, Eli Lily, 2, Janssen, 8, Mundipharma, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, Roche, 8, Sandoz, 8, Sanofi Genzyme, 5; A. den Broeder, AbbVie, 9, Amgen, 8, Biogen, 9, BMS, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 8, Cellgene, 9, Fresenius, 8, Roche, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Verhoef L, den Broeder N, Thurlings R, van der Laan W, van der Weele W, Kok M, Bernelot Moens H, Woodworth T, van den Bemt B, van den Hoogen F, den Broeder A. Ultra-Low Doses of Rituximab for Retreatment of RA: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultra-low-doses-of-rituximab-for-retreatment-of-ra-a-randomized-controlled-non-inferiority-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultra-low-doses-of-rituximab-for-retreatment-of-ra-a-randomized-controlled-non-inferiority-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology