ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 476

Two-Year Results From The Ample Trial: Low Disease Activity and Association Between Remission and Changes In Physical Function and Radiographic Outcomes With Subcutaneous Abatacept Or Adalimumab

Roy Fleischmann1, M Schiff2, M E Weinblatt3, M Maldonado4, E Massarotti5 and Y Yazici6, 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 3Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 5Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 6New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Abatacept, adalimumab and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Remission and low disease activity (LDA) are now more achievable goals in RA. Year 1 data from the head-to-head AMPLE (Abatacept vs Adalimumab Comparison in Biologic-Naive RA Patients with Background MTX) study showed comparable rates of remission and LDA for patients treated with subcutaneous (SC) abatacept or adalimumab.1 To assess whether these responses are maintained over time and to evaluate the relationship with functional and radiographic outcomes, we report Year 2 data from AMPLE.   Methods: AMPLE is a 2-year, Phase IIIb, randomized, investigator-blinded study. Biologic-naïve patients with RA and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to 125 mg SC abatacept weekly or 40 mg SC adalimumab bi-weekly, with background MTX.1 The proportions of patients achieving remission (defined as Disease Activity Score [DAS]28 [C-reactive protein; CRP] <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] ≤2.8, Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] ≤3.3, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data [RAPID]3 <3, Boolean score ≤1) or LDA (defined as DAS28 [CRP] ≤3.2, CDAI ≤10, SDAI ≤11, RAPID3 ≤6) are presented. Physical function (assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-D]I; responders defined as an improvement of ≥0.3) and radiographic non-progression (defined as change in modified total Sharp score of ≤ smallest detectable change) were analyzed in patients achieving remission at 2 years.   Results: A total of 646 patients were randomized and treated with abatacept (n=318) or adalimumab (n=328) on background MTX. Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced between treatments. The proportions of patients in remission or LDA at Year 2 were comparable for both treatments (Table), and were higher than those reported at Year 1.1,2 More patients achieved DAS28 (CRP) remission compared with CDAI, SDAI, and RAPID3 remission, with the smallest proportion achieving Boolean remission. Depending on the criteria used to assess remission, 65.9–80.2% of adalimumab-treated patients and 72.7–81.2% of abatacept-treated patients who were in remission at Year 1 were maintained in a state of remission at Year 2. Across all criteria, >70% of patients in remission at Year 2 were also HAQ-DI responders, and >85% were radiographic non-progressors at Year 2. Improvement in physical function and radiographic outcomes at Year 2 were consistent between the two treatments.  

SC abatacept + MTX n/N (%) SC adalimumab + MTX n/N (%)
Remission criteria    
DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 127/251 (50.6) 130/244 (53.3)
CDAI ≤2.8 80/250 (32.0) 74/244 (30.3)
SDAI ≤3.3 78/250 (31.2) 79/243 (32.5)
RAPID3 (0–30) ≤3 77/248 (31.0) 61/233 (26.2)
Boolean 52/251 (20.7) 50/244 (20.5)
Low disease activity criteria    
DAS28 (CRP) ≤3.2 164/251 (65.3) 166/244 (68.0)
CDAI ≤10 164/250 (65.6) 165/244 (67.6)
SDAI ≤11 163/250 (65.2) 168/243 (69.1)
RAPID3 (0–30) ≤6 123/248 (49.6) 116/233 (49.8)
  Conclusion: Over 2 years of the AMPLE study, rates of remission and LDA increased over time across all criteria and remained comparable for SC abatacept and adalimumab. All remission criteria demonstrated high correlation with physical function and radiographic outcomes, with similar improvements in each treatment group at Year 2.   References: 1. Weinblatt M, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:28–38. 2. Fleischmann R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72(Suppl. 3):626.

Disclosure:

R. Fleischmann,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbvie,

5,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbvie,

2;

M. Schiff,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbvie,

5;

M. E. Weinblatt,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janseen,

5;

M. Maldonado,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

3,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

1;

E. Massarotti,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2,

UCB,

5;

Y. Yazici,

Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, UCB ,

5,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech ,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/two-year-results-from-the-ample-trial-low-disease-activity-and-association-between-remission-and-changes-in-physical-function-and-radiographic-outcomes-with-subcutaneous-abatacept-or-adalimumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology