ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1313

Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment Normalises Hand Bone Loss in a Minority of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated in Clinical Practice. Results from the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study and the Danbio Registry

Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg1, Mikkel Østergaard1, Trine David Jensen2, Pernille Bach Mortensen2, Lars Hyldstrup2, Pernille Boyesen3, Anja Thormann1, Ulrik Tarp1, Wolfgang Bøhme1, Hanne Lindegaard1, Uta Engling Poulsen1, Annette Hansen1, Annette Schlemmer1, Niels Graudal1, Anne Rødgaard Andersen1, Jakob Espesen1, Gina Kollerup1, Bente Glintborg1, Ole Rintek Madsen1, Dorte Vendelbo Jensen1 and Merete Lund Hetland1, 1DANBIO, On behalf of Depts of Rheumatology, North, South, Central, Zealand and Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Dept. of Endocrinology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Bone density and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II: X-ray, MRI, PET and CT

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterised by progressive joint destruction and loss of periarticular bone mass. Thus hand bone loss (HBL) has been proposed as an outcome measure for treatment efficacy. A definition of increased HBL adjusted for age- and gender-related bone loss is lacking. We aimed to establish a HBL reference material and investigate whether HBL normalises in RA patients during tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFα-I) treatment in clinical practice.

Methods: Hand bone mass (DXR-BMD) was assessed by Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry (DXR), a computerised method of estimating cortical bone mineral density in the 2nd – 4thmetacarpal bone, in a reference population and a patient cohort. The reference population was 1,487/ 2,541 randomly selected men/women who had hand x-rays done in the cross-sectional Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Linear regression analyses were fitted to the data and mean age-related changes in DXR-BMD (ie. normal HBL) estimated for men and women.

The patient cohort comprised 135 patients in the DANBIO registry with hand x-rays obtained ~2 years prior to TNFα-I (pre-baseline, patients treated with conventional synthethic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARD)), at start of TNFα-I (baseline) and ~ 2 years after TNFα-I start (follow-up). Annual HBL during csDMARD and TNFα-I treatment were calculated in the individual patients and compared with the lower 95% CI of normal HBL for the matching age and gender to assess if increased HBL was present. 

Results: Table 1 presents the HBL reference material. The 135 RA patients (85% women, 71% IgM-RF positive, median age 55(range 23-84) years; median disease duration 5(range 1-53) years) had a median pre-baseline DAS28 of 4.3(range 1.6-6.9) and a baseline DAS28 of 5.3(1.4-8.2). TNFα-I treatment was infliximab (74%), etanercept (13%) or adalimumab  (13%). At follow-up (DAS28 3.1(1.4-7.7) 59% received the initial TNFα-I, 27% had switched to another biological drug and 14%  had withdrawn.

Compared to the reference population, 101 (75%) patients had increased HBL during csDMARD treatment while 79 (59%) patients had increased HBL during TNFα-I treatment (p = 0.17,Chi-Sq). In 38 patients with increased HBL during csDMARD treatment HBL was normalised during TNF-I. Sixteen patients had normal HBL during csDMARD treatment but increased HBL during treatment with TNFα-I.

Conclusion: We have established a reference material for HBL in the general population. Increased HBL was present in the majority of RA patients initiating TNFα-I treatment in clinical practice and was normalised in few patients during treatment.

Table 1

Age-related changes of DXR-BMD in 2,541 Danish women and 1,485 Danish men

Women

Absolute 1 year change

 

Men

Absolute 1 year change

 

Age (years)

N

BMD (g/cm2), mean (SD)

Estimated hand bone loss (g/cm2)

(95 % CI)

N

BMD (g/cm2), mean (SD)

Estimated hand bone loss (g/cm2)

(95 % CI)

18-29

41

0.597 (0.05)

0.00416 (0.00268 – 0.00564)

32

0.666 (0.06)

-0.00012 (-0.00095 – 0.00071)

30-34

51

0.599 (0.04)

0.00123 (0.00031 – 0.00213)

35

0.671 (0.06)

-0.00060 (-0.00128 – 0.00007)

35-39

84

0.601 (0.05)

– 0.00066 (-0.00122 – -0.00009)

45

0.679 (0.05)

-0.00098 (-0.00153 – -0.00042)

40-44

116

0.589 (0.04)

– 0.00224 (-0.00260 – -0.00189)

71

0.660 (0.05)

-0.00135 (-0.00179- -0.00090)

45-49

131

0.592 (0.05)

-0.00351 (-0.00379 – -0.00323)

98

0.668 (0.05)

-0.00172 (-0.00206 – -0.00138)

50-54

185

0.569 (0.05)

-0.00437 (-0.00470 – -0.00411)

133

0.653 (0.05)

-0.00202 (-0.00235 – -0.00184)

55-59

322

0.541 (0.05)

-0.00513 (-0.00543 – -0.00483)

209

0.636 (0.05)

-0.00247 (-0.00269 – -0.00225)

60-64

311

0.513 (0.06)

-0.00548 (-0.00575 – -0.00521)

198

0.623 (0.06)

-0.00284 (-0.00309- -0.00259)

65-69

430

0.486 (0.06)

-0.00552 (-0.00577 – -0.00527)

211

0.602 (0.06)

-0.00321 (-0.00354- -0.00288)

70-74

394

0.460 (0.05)

-0.00525 (-0.00559- -0.00492)

213

0.594 (0.06)

-0.00358 (-0.00401- -0.00316)

75-79

307

0.440 (0.05)

-0.00468 (-0.00525- -0.00410)

140

0.572 (0.06)

-0.00396 (-0.00450- -0.00342)

80-84

123

0.411 (0.05)

-0.00380 (-0.00472 – -0.00288)

68

0.563 (0.06)

-0.00432 (-0.00499- -0.00367)

85-93

   46

0.400 (0.06)

-0.00261 (-0.00397- -0.00124)

32

0.534 (0.08)

-0.00470 (-0.00548- -0.00392)

Total

2541

0.505 (0.08)

 

1485

0.619 (0.08)

 

DXR: Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry; BMD: Bone Mineral Density;  CI: Confidence Interval.


Disclosure: L. M. Ørnbjerg, None; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 8,Janssen Pfizer, 8,BMS, 8,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8,UCB, 8,Abbvie, 2,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 2,BMS, 2,Merck Human Health, 2; T. D. Jensen, None; P. Bach Mortensen, None; L. Hyldstrup, None; P. Boyesen, None; A. Thormann, None; U. Tarp, None; W. Bøhme, None; H. Lindegaard, None; U. E. Poulsen, None; A. Hansen, None; A. Schlemmer, None; N. Graudal, None; A. R. Andersen, None; J. Espesen, None; G. Kollerup, None; B. Glintborg, None; O. Rintek Madsen, None; D. V. Jensen, None; M. Lund Hetland, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ørnbjerg LM, Østergaard M, Jensen TD, Bach Mortensen P, Hyldstrup L, Boyesen P, Thormann A, Tarp U, Bøhme W, Lindegaard H, Poulsen UE, Hansen A, Schlemmer A, Graudal N, Andersen AR, Espesen J, Kollerup G, Glintborg B, Rintek Madsen O, Jensen DV, Lund Hetland M. Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment Normalises Hand Bone Loss in a Minority of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated in Clinical Practice. Results from the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study and the Danbio Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tumour-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-treatment-normalises-hand-bone-loss-in-a-minority-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-in-clinical-practice-results-from-the-copenhagen-osteoarthritis-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tumour-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-treatment-normalises-hand-bone-loss-in-a-minority-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-in-clinical-practice-results-from-the-copenhagen-osteoarthritis-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology