ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1976

Treatment Satisfaction in Postmenopausal Women Previously Treated with Bisphosphonates Who Transitioned to Denosumab Vs Ibandronate Therapy in an Open-Label Study

Santiago Palacios1, Giovanni Iolascon2, Irene Agodoa3, Hema Viswanathan3, Prayashi Ghelani4, Irene Ferreira5, Cynthia O'Malley6, Rachel B. Wagman7 and Sydney Bonnick8, 1Instituto Palacios, Madrid, Spain, 2Seconda Universita di Napoli, Naples, Italy, 3Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, 4Ovatech Solutions, London, United Kingdom, 5Amgen Inc., Cambridge, United Kingdom, 6Center for Observational Research, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 7Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 8Clinical Research Center of North Texas, Denton, TX

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: denosumab, ibandronate and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Higher treatment satisfaction is associated with greater persistence with osteoporosis therapy in postmenopausal women (Barrett-Connor OI 2012). Greater satisfaction has been reported with subcutaneous injections of denosumab compared with oral alendronate tablets in a randomized, cross-over study where subjects received both treatments (Freemantle OI 2012). In this open-label trial, we evaluated treatment satisfaction in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) who were sub-optimally treated with prior bisphosphonate therapy and were transitioned to denosumab or ibandronate.

Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study in which postmenopausal women aged 55 and older were randomized 1:1 to receive open-label denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months or ibandronate 150 mg orally every month for 12 months. The treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM) version 1.4 was given at baseline and months 6 and 12 or at time of early termination. TSQM is a validated tool that measures the subject’s perception of the 4 domains of treatment satisfaction: the medication’s effectiveness, convenience, side effects, and global satisfaction (Atkinson Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004). Each TSQM domain score is between 0 and 100 and a higher score indicates a more preferred health status. Treatment comparisons of change in TSQM from baseline to months 6 and 12 were analyzed using an ANCOVA model fitted with treatment group and adjusted for baseline TSQM domain score.

Results: The study population included 833 women (417 denosumab; 416 ibandronate) with a mean (SD) age of 66.7 (8.0) years and mean (SD) BMD T-scores of –1.8 (0.7) at the total hip,
–2.1 (0.7) at the femoral neck, and –2.5 (0.8) at the lumbar spine. Compared with the TSQM scores at baseline, subjects in both treatment groups reported greater satisfaction in all domains of the TSQM at month 6 and at month 12. However, subjects who transitioned to denosumab therapy had significantly greater improvements among all domains than did subjects who transitioned to ibandronate therapy at month 6 (P ≤ 0.0004 in all domains; data not shown) and at month 12 (P ≤ 0.0003 in all domains; Table 1).

Conclusion: In summary, postmenopausal women with low BMD who were sub-optimally treated with prior bisphosphonate therapy reported greater satisfaction if they transitioned to denosumab vs ibandronate in an open-label study. Greater treatment satisfaction may lead to better adherence to therapy and thus improvements in treatment efficacy.

Table 1. TSQM Change From Baseline to Month 12

TSQM Domain

Treatment

n

LS Mean

95% CI

P-value*

Effectiveness

Ibandronate

332

17.9

15.6, 20.2

< 0.0001

Denosumab

378

24.1

22.0, 26.3

Convenience

Ibandronate

338

16.7

14.9, 18.6

< 0.0001

Denosumab

384

26.3

24.6, 28.0

Side Effects

Ibandronate

337

4.2

2.7, 5.8

  0.0003

Denosumab

385

8.1

6.7, 9.6

Global Satisfaction

Ibandronate

337

14.9

12.8, 17.1

< 0.0001

Denosumab

382

26.4

24.4, 28.4

n = number of subjects with non-missing TSQM domain at baseline and at month 12. LS = least squares. CI = confidence interval. *P-value from treatment comparison based on an ANCOVA model fitted with treatment group and adjusted for baseline TSQM domain score.



Disclosure:

S. Palacios,

Amgen Inc.,

2;

G. Iolascon,

Merck Italia,

8;

I. Agodoa,

Amgen,

1,

Amgen,

3;

H. Viswanathan,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

P. Ghelani,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

I. Ferreira,

Amgen Inc., Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

C. O’Malley,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

R. B. Wagman,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

S. Bonnick,

Amgen Inc., Takeda, Merck, Wyeth,

2,

Amgen Inc., Novartis,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-satisfaction-in-postmenopausal-women-previously-treated-with-bisphosphonates-who-transitioned-to-denosumab-vs-ibandronate-therapy-in-an-open-label-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology