ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2266

Treatment Preferences in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis

Dafne Capelusnik1, Emilce Schneeberger 2, Leonela Lysseth Macias Oviedo 1, Juan Manuel Sevillano Gutierrez 3 and Gustavo Citera 4, 1Instituto de Rehabilitacion Psicofisica, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Instituto de Rehabilitacion Psicofisica, CABA, Argentina, 4Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis, treatment and patient preferences

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II: Patient Preferences, Beliefs, & Experiences – ARP

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Due to the increasing tendency of involving patients in decisions regarding their health care and knowing the need for further research on patients’ preferences about treatment and adherence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment preferences of patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and to identify the factors associated with their choice.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with axSpA (ASAS 2009 criteria) were included. Sociodemographic data, disease characteristics, disease activity and treatments received were recorded. A specially designed questionnaire was administered to evaluate patient preference for the drug administration, doses frequency, the favorite site and the person chosen for the drug administration. Also the attributes and disadvantages of the chosen rout were assessed, as well as the characteristics and compliance with the current treatment. Statistical analysis: Student’s T-test, Chi2 test and multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results: Seventy patients were included with a median age (m) of 46.5 years (IQR 38-57), 55 males (78.6%) and a median disease duration of 13.5 years (7.75-23.25).
According to the patients, the relevant aspects in decreasing order of frequency for choosing a treatment were: the ability to improve quality of life (32.9%), improvement in joint inflammation (22.9%), pain (21.4%) and physical function (14.3%). Sixty-three patients (90%) chose to receive the medication at home, and 55 (78.6%) chose to self-administrate the drug. The most chosen mode of administration was oral (51.4%), following by subcutaneous (SC) (41.4%), intramuscular (IM) 4.3% and intravenous (IV) 2.9%. The preferred frequency of oral administration was one tablet per week (61.1%) and SC administration, once a month (34.5%). The main advantages of oral administration were: the easy administration (58.3%), no need for a special skill (33.3%) and no requirement of refrigeration (16.7%), and in the case of SC: the easy application (44.8%), the efficacy (27.6%) and the safety (13.8%). The choice of oral route was associated with: preference for self-administration (88.9% vs 11.2%, p = 0.05), preference for receiving the medication at home (97.2% vs 2.8%, p = 0.02) and higher level of education (14.5 ± 4.2 years vs 11.5 ± 4.7 years, p = 0.009). These last two variables remained significant in the multivariate analysis.
The choice of the SC route was independently associated with the type of axSpA (46.7% in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) vs 10% in non-radiographic axSpA (nr), p = 0.038).
The patients with greater adherence to treatment were receiving more frequent biological SC treatment (52.7% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.008), and had lower disease activity, higher functional capacity and better quality of life. In the multiple logistic regression model, being receiving biological SC treatment and having lower disease activity remained significantly associated with the treatment compliance according to the patient.

Conclusion: The most preferred way of administration by patients with axSpA was the oral route, with a weekly frequency and self-administration at home, followed by the subcutaneous route, with monthly infusion.


Disclosure: D. Capelusnik, None; E. Schneeberger, None; L. Macias Oviedo, None; J. Sevillano Gutierrez, None; G. Citera, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 5, BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB ARGENTINA, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Gema Biotech, 2, 5, 8, Genzyme, 5, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi Genzyme, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Capelusnik D, Schneeberger E, Macias Oviedo L, Sevillano Gutierrez J, Citera G. Treatment Preferences in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-preferences-in-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-preferences-in-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology