ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1840

Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Newly Initiated On Non-Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

Jeffrey R. Curtis1, Genevieve Gauthier2, Robert Hiscock2 and Frank Zhang3, 1Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Pricing and Market Access, I&I, Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, DMARDs, psoriatic arthritis and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research: Rheumatic Disease Pharmacoepidemiology

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Several treatment options are available for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients (pts). Oral disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are often used as a first-line treatment when non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) failed to control the PsA symptoms. Few studies have reported the treatment patterns in current PsA management in real-world settings. The objective of this study was to describe treatment changes (i.e., discontinuations and therapy modifications) following the initiation of a non-biologic DMARD in PsA pts.

Methods: Adult pts with ≥2 PsA diagnoses from physician office visits were selected from the MarketScan Commercial Claims database (2005-2009). All pts were required to have continuous insurance coverage ≥6-month prior to and ≥12-month post index date. First prescription date of a non-biologic DMARD was the index date and the preceding 6 months defined the ‘baseline’. Pts who used any biologic/non-biologic DMARDs or had a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis during the baseline were excluded. Treatment discontinuation was defined as a treatment interruption of ≥60 consecutive days between the end of days’ supply of one prescription and the start of the next prescription for the index drug. Switch in therapy was defined as the initiation of a biologic/non-biologic DMARD (not used at the index date or during the baseline) within 60 days of the discontinuation date of the index DMARD. Therapy augmentation was defined as the use of a non-biologic or biologic DMARD (not used at the index date or during the baseline) concomitantly with the index non-biologic DMARD for ≥28 consecutive days after the index date. A treatment change was defined as either a switch in therapy or an augmentation to the index therapy. Treatment patterns were captured over the one-year study period following the index date.  Since pts might have used different DMARDs during the study period, the 4 most frequent treatment sequences (excluding treatment interruption) were also reported.

Results: A total of 1,698 PsA pts met the selection criteria; 71.7% initiated on methotrexate, 17.5% on sulfasalazine. Over the 12-month study period, 72.5% of the pts had ≥ 1 therapy change (median time: 86 days). More specifically, 57.7% of pts discontinued the index non-biologic DMARD (median time: 89 days), 13.1% switched to a biologic DMARD (median time: 141 days), 9.3% switched to another non-biologic DMARD (median time: 111 days), 21.4% had a therapy augmentation with a biologic DMARD (median time: 119) and 7.4% had a therapy augmentation with another non-biologic DMARD (median time: 94).  The most common treatment sequences observed were 1) pts used MTX only during the study period (42.5%), 2) pts used MTX and a biologic (22.0%), 3) pts used sulfasalazine only (9.8%), and 4) pts used MTX and sulfasalazine (4.2%). Among pts who initiated a biologic during the study period (N=513), 90.8% did not use other oral DMARDs, while 9.2% also initiated another oral DMARD either in combination or sequentially.

Conclusion: This study suggests that PsA pts newly initiated on a non-biologic DMARD do not remain on the index therapy for a long period of time. Most pts switched to or added on biologics quickly without using a second oral DMARD.


Disclosure:

J. R. Curtis,

Celgene, Roche/Genetech, UCB< Centocor, Corrona,Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, Abbott, 2, Celgene, Roche/Genetech,UCB, Centocor, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, Abbott, 5; G. Gauthier,

Celgene Corporation,

5;

R. Hiscock,

Celgene Corporation,

5;

F. Zhang,

Celgene Corporation,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-patterns-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-newly-initiated-on-non-biologic-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology