ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1425

Treatment Patterns in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Newly Initiated on Biologic and Non-Biologic Therapy Enrolled in a North American Clinical Registry

Philip J Mease1, Neil Accortt2, Mei Liu3, Sabrina Rebello3, Mahdi Gharaibeh2 and David Collier2, 1Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents, combination therapies, DMARDs, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II: Prognostic Factors, Imaging and Miscellaneous Reports

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Many treatment options are currently available to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi’s). While combination therapy of TNFi’s or other biologics with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD; commonly methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, or hydroxychloroquine) is thought to be the most effective treatment option, few studies have examined changes in treatment initiation over time. This study describes RA treatment patterns among patients newly initiated on biologic and non-biologic therapy over time.

Methods: This retrospective, cohort study included adult patients with RA enrolled in the Corrona RA registry who initiated monotherapy with a biologic or csDMARD or combination therapy between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015. Patients were required to have ≥ 6 months of follow-up time after initiation of therapy, with at least one follow-up visit. Patients could belong to one of five cohorts: TNFi monotherapy, other biologic monotherapy, csDMARD monotherapy, combination therapy with TNFi + csDMARD, or combination therapy with other biologic + csDMARD. Cohorts were defined by the first treatment initiation after enrollment into Corrona and were mutually exclusive. The primary outcome of interest was time on therapy. Time periods of interest were 2004-2007, 2008-2011, and 2012-2015; these were based on the year of enrollment into Corrona. Data were analyzed descriptively by cohort.

Results: There were 8,027 patients in this analysis. Overall, the majority of patients were female (77%), white (82%), and biologic-naïve (60%), with mean (SD) duration of RA 7.9 (9.2) years. 9.6%, 4.6%, 37.2%, 37.6%, and 11.0% of patients initiated TNFi monotherapy, other biologic monotherapy, csDMARD monotherapy, combination therapy with TNFi + csDMARD, and combination therapy with other biologic + csDMARD, respectively. Over time, treatment initiation between monotherapy and combination therapy has not changed: about half of patients initiated monotherapy and half combination therapy, mostly TNFi + csDMARD (Table). Mean CDAI at treatment initiation has remained similar within the TNFi monotherapy cohort over the three time periods. Patients who initiated csDMARD monotherapy had the lowest CDAI at treatment initiation, while TNFi and other biologic monotherapy and both combination therapy cohorts had comparable CDAI. Time on drug has remained stable for TNFi monotherapy and decreased for all other cohorts; in the most recent time period, time on drug was similar among all cohorts.

Conclusion: In the Corrona registry, over time, treatment initiation between monotherapy and combination therapy has changed little. Mean time on drug has decreased over time, likely due to the availability of more treatment options and/or the emphasis on achievement of treat-to-target goals.


Disclosure: P. J. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB Pharma, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB Pharma, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, 8; N. Accortt, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; M. Liu, Corrona, 3; S. Rebello, Corrona, LLC, 3; M. Gharaibeh, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; D. Collier, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease PJ, Accortt N, Liu M, Rebello S, Gharaibeh M, Collier D. Treatment Patterns in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Newly Initiated on Biologic and Non-Biologic Therapy Enrolled in a North American Clinical Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-patterns-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-newly-initiated-on-biologic-and-non-biologic-therapy-enrolled-in-a-north-american-clinical-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-patterns-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-newly-initiated-on-biologic-and-non-biologic-therapy-enrolled-in-a-north-american-clinical-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology