ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1684

Treatment of Scleroderma Associated Lung Disease with Mycophenolate Mofetil: A Community-Based Study

Audrey Bearden1, Kent Kwasind Huston2 and Judy Foxworth3, 1Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 2Rheumatology, The Center for Rheumatic Disease, Kansas City, MO, 3Associate Program Director & Director of Research, The University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, mycophenolate mofetil, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics: Systemic Sclerosis, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  Interstitial lung disease occurs in over 80% of patients with scleroderma. Cyclophosphamide is the only treatment proven to benefit scleroderma lung disease in a large randomized placebo-controlled trial. However, the clinical benefit is modest and potential adverse effects are a major concern. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been reported to stabilize scleroderma lung disease in case series from academic institutions. However, patient characteristics may vary from the academic to community setting and the relevance of these reports to the broader rheumatology community is uncertain. Our purpose is to analyze the effect of MMF in scleroderma lung disease from a community-based rheumatology clinic. 

Methods:  Patients who fulfilled the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for scleroderma were identified in a community-based rheumatology practice.  All patients included had evidence of scleroderma lung disease and treatment with MMF. Exclusion criteria were patients treated for < 4months,  >14 months between baseline data and initiation of MMF, or >24 months after initiation of MMF for follow-up data.  Lung functions, CT scans, and clinical symptoms were analyzed at baseline and post treatment.  A total of thirteen patients were identified who met the above criteria. A paired student t-test was performed to assess pre and post MMF treatment change in forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). 

Results:  A total of 22 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these 22 patients, 1 was deceased from pulmonary arterial hypertension, 2 stopped treatment before follow-up due to severe diarrhea, and 6 did not have timely baseline or follow-up data. This left 13 patients for analysis who were treated an average of 10 months with MMF. There was no significant difference between baseline and post treatment values for FVC or DLCO (p=0.89, p =0.76, respectively).  The mean % predicted FVC pre and post MMF was 72 and 72 respectively. The mean % predicted DLCO pre and post MMF was 66 and 67 respectively. There were only two individuals who experienced a significant decline in FVC from baseline to follow up as defined by national criteria (absolute change in FVC of 10%).Baseline and post treatment CT scans were also evaluated. Of the 13 patients, 9 had stable CT findings, 2 worsened, and 2 improved. Clinical symptoms of cough and dyspnea were all stable or improved on MMF therapy.

Conclusion:  MMF appears effective in preventing progression of scleroderma lung disease in a community-based setting. Compared to historical controls, we would have expected worsening lung function in the absence of treatment as seen in the placebo arm of the Scleroderma Lung Study. Limitations to our study include the lack of a standard protocol for individual rheumatologists to record symptoms, clinical findings, or standard intervals for pulmonary function tests and CT scans. Also, pre and post treatment CT scans were not universally interpreted by the same radiologist. These limitations were expected given the nature of rheumatology practice outside of academic centers. Our study supports the use of MMF for scleroderma lung disease in the community-based setting.


Disclosure:

A. Bearden,
None;

K. K. Huston,
None;

J. Foxworth,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-scleroderma-associated-lung-disease-with-mycophenolate-mofetil-a-community-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology