ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2582

Treatment Of Pulmonary Hypertension In Scleroderma Patients With Restricitive Lung Disease.Observations From The Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition Of Outcomes In Scleroderma  Cohort

Virginia D. Steen1 and Robyn T. Domsic2, 1Department of Rheumatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 2Medicine - Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Pulmonary Involvement, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Trials of therapy in  pulmonary  hypertension(PH)  have generally excluded patients with significant interstitial lung disease, but many patients with systemic sclerosis(SSc)  and  PH  have some interstitial lung disease.   There are concerns that PH drugs may cause ventilation-perfusion mismatch and worsen PH, and it remains unclear if PH drugs improve outcomes for these patients.  PHAROS , Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma, is a prospective observational  multi-center cohort study of  SSc-PH.   Our objective is to describe the real-world experience of SSc-PH patients with restrictive lung disease treated with a single PH medication.   

Methods:

We included  patients with PH defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25mmHg  on catheterization who had a FVC <70% predicted at the time of the diagnosis.  Patients were grouped into 3 groups, based on the treatment during the first year following the PH diagnosis:  No drug treatment, treatment with  an endothelin receptor blocker antagonist (ERA), or   andphosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE).    For this initial look at the data, patients treated with combination therapy and/or  prostacyclins (PCA)  were excluded.  The primary outcome examined was one-year survival, with secondary outcomes of hospitalization, change in functional class, 6 minute walk  and patient questionnaires at one year.  

Results:

Of the 266 patients with PH in PHAROS,  98 had a FVC <70% and were included . There were 26 receiving no therapy (No Drug), 19 receiving ERA and 33 treated with PDE.  We excluded 18 treated with combination and 2 treated with PCAs alone.  There were no significant differences in the demographics or the cardiopulmonary parameters between the 3 groups.  These patients had striking restrictive disease with a mean FVC between 50 and 55% predicted.  Although over survival was not statistically different between the 3 groups,  patients in the PDE group had fewer deaths and a better 1 and 2 year survival than the No Drug group.  (p<0.05).    There were more patients in the PDE group who had an improvement compared to the ND group and neither treatment group had an increase in hospitalizations after starting the drugs (Table 1).  

Conclusion:

SSc patients with PH and restrictive lung disease are being treated with PH drugs.  Our observations suggest that  some patients may respond favorably, without evidence of worsening PH.   We strongly encourage further study of PH drugs in SSc-ILD patients in a controlled setting.  

 

 

No Drug  n=26

ERA  n=19

PDE  n=33

Age – yr, mean

54.5

57.2

56.8

Disease Duration yr, mean

10.1

8.3

9.2

% Female sex

70

79

62

% White race

    76

63

64

% Diffuse  cutaneous

42

63

42

FVC% predicted

52.2

49.9

55.5

DLCO % predicted

33.6

25.9

42.0

RHC m PAP

  31.85

33.3

36

PVR  (Woods)

293

343

419

Response in 1st year

23%

  37%

43%

Hospitalizations

2

1

2

Deaths in 1st year

7

3

1

Survival, 1, 2 year

69%,  61%

82%,  64%

96%,  76%


Disclosure:

V. D. Steen,

Gilead Science, ,

2,

Gilead Science,

5,

Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,

2,

Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,

8,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Celgene,

2,

Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical,

2;

R. T. Domsic,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-pulmonary-hypertension-in-scleroderma-patients-with-restricitive-lung-disease-observations-from-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-coho/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology