ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2231

Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis with Tumour Necrosis Factor á Antagonists Successfully Maintains Work Capacity: 2 Year Results of a Prospective Cohort Study

Leonard C. Harty1, Alex Franciosi2, Naomi Pettysan2, Paul Rushe2 and Oliver M. FitzGerald1, 1Rheumatology, Dublin Academic Medical Centre, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 2Department of Rheumatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Employment, psoriatic arthritis and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Treatment resistant psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may render a patient unwell, disabled and incapable of work with previous reports suggesting that unemployment levels among PsA patients range from 30-50%, higher than the current national unemployment level of 14.7%. It is argued that the clinical, functional and quality of life benefits of tumour necrosis factor α inhibitor drugs (TNFi) may not be sufficient to justify their significant economic cost (national cost, >€100 million/year in 2010). We sought to evaluate longitudinal employment levels among PsA patients treated with TNFi therapy.   

Methods: A prospective cohort study of TNFi treated PsA patients between the ages of 18-65 fulfilling the ClASsification of Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria with active disease despite DMARD therapy was undertaken. Economic status and disease activity were recorded at baseline and following commencement of TNFi therapy. DDAS >1.2 was considered a good clinical response. Descriptive variables are presented as means (Standard Deviation) or percentages.

Results: Employment status of 114 PsA patients was reviewed at a mean of 26 months (22) after starting TNFi therapy. 51% were female, mean age 48 (11) and mean duration of disease of 13 years (8). 50% patients were treated with etanercept, 38% adalimumab, 6% golimumab and 6% infliximab with 46% also receiving DMARD therapy. 2% and 15% continued to take low dose oral steroids and PRN NSAIDs respectively. 79% of patients were judged good clinical responders. 92 patients were in full time employment at baseline.  83/92 (90%) continued in employment with 6 retiring and 3 becoming redundant. Those who retired or became redundant had a higher DAS 28 score at follow up than those who remained in employment (2.4 v 3.2 (ns)). 22 patients were unemployed upon commencing TNFi with 5 of them returning to the workforce. Of those who did not, 14 were on disability benefit prior to starting TNFi, 2 were unemployed and 1 had retired. Only 4% of all patients required home help.

Conclusion: 90% of TNFi treated PsA patients maintain their employed status with 23% of previously unemployed TNFi treated PsA patients returning to the workforce. Cumulatively, 22.8% of our TNFi treated PsA patients are unemployed, an improvement on previous published levels indicating a potential economic benefit of TNFi that may become more apparent in the future. Maintenance of an individual’s work capacity likely results in societal savings that help to offset the substantial cost of TNFi treatment.


Disclosure:

L. C. Harty,
None;

A. Franciosi,
None;

N. Pettysan,
None;

P. Rushe,
None;

O. M. FitzGerald,

Abbott Laboratories Ireland, Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2,

Abbott Laboratories Ireland, UCB,

5,

Abbott Laboratories Ireland,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-with-tumour-necrosis-factor-a-antagonists-successfully-maintains-work-capacity-2-year-results-of-a-prospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology