ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 384

Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis to Target: A Canadian Patient Survey

Boulos Haraoui1, William G. Bensen2, J. Carter Thorne3, John P. Wade4, Melissa Deamude5, Jane M. Prince6 and Jean Legare7, 1Rheumatology, Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph's Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 3Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 4Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Dr. William G. Bensen, Rheumatology Health Team, St. Joseph's Hospital Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 6Vancouver Arthritis Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Arthritis Alliance of Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Quality of care and questionnaires

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Drug Studies/Drug Safety/Drug Utilization/Disease Activity & Remission

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Recently, many countries, including Canada, evaluated rheumatologists’ acceptance and agreement with a set of 10 Treat to Target (T2T) recommendations for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), developed by an international task force.1-3In this study, the Canadian T2T steering committee evaluated how Canadian patients with RA perceive these recommendations. To assess the current state of RA management in Canada from a patient perspective and to assess whether, and to what extent, Canadians with RA agree with the 10 T2T recommendations.

Methods: Participating rheumatologists were asked to invite consecutive RA patients to complete a 20-question survey. The survey was designed to assess relevant socio-demographic variables, disease duration, current approach to RA management as seen from the patient perspective, and agreement with the T2T recommendations. Each T2T recommendation was re-phrased and/or re-worded in order to be easily understood by all RA patients, regardless of their level of education.4

Results: A total of 959 patients (77% females) were recruited by 22 participating rheumatologists from 6 Canadian provinces.  Patients had a mean age of 59.1 yrs and a mean disease duration of 12.9 yrs. Approximately 72% of patients were on methotrexate (23.9% monotherapy, 76.1% combination therapy), 22.5% were treated with biologics (13.4% monotherapy, 86.6% combination therapy), and 17.5% were receiving corticosteroids.  The patients’ mean pain intensity over the week preceding the survey was 3.4 on a 10-point scale. The majority (88%) of patients was seen by their rheumatologist every 2-6 months; approximately 92% indicated having their joints examined and being asked about their daily activities at every visit. Over 89% of the patients rated ≥8 on a 10-point scale on the clarity of their rheumatologist’s explanation. In Canada, agreement with the T2T recommendations was higher among patients than rheumatologists: For patients, the results ranged from 8.6 for recommendation #4 (frequency of adjustment of drug therapy) to 9.5 for recommendation #7 (consideration for making clinical decisions). The average rheumatologists’ agreement scores  ranged from 6.9 for recommendation #5 (the frequency of measures of disease activity) to 9.1 for recommendation #10 (the patient needs to be involved in the decision-making process).3Among patients, agreement with recommendation #4 decreased with increasing age of the patient (from 9.1 for patients <43 yrs to 7.9 for patients >74 yrs). The agreement with recommendation #5 was significantly higher for patients in Quebec (9.4) and New Brunswick (9.3) compared to British Columbia (8.6)

Conclusion: The results of this survey shed some light on the management of RA in Canada and demonstrated a significant level of agreement with the T2T recommendations among Canadian patients. Additional efforts may be required to identify the reasons behind differences in agreement levels between patients and physicians in order to narrow certain gaps and improve RA management.

1. Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis.2010;69(4):631-637.
2. Haraoui B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):1999-2002.
3. Haraoui B, et al. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):949-953.
4. De Wit MP, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun; 70(6): 891-5.


Disclosure:

B. Haraoui,
None;

W. G. Bensen,
None;

J. C. Thorne,
None;

J. P. Wade,
None;

M. Deamude,
None;

J. M. Prince,
None;

J. Legare,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treating-rheumatoid-arthritis-to-target-a-canadian-patient-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology