ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2396

Treat to Target in Routine Clinical Practice

Mohammad Solaiman1, Olga Semenova1, Helen Thompson1, Joanne Cunnington1, Elaine Baguley2, Sathish Kallankara3, Olanbambo Ogunbambi1 and Yusuf Patel4, 1Rheumatology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom, 2Anlaby Road, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology, Hull Yoyal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom, 4Department of Rheumatology, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Hull East Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: remission

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

In order to overcome obstacles with overbooked outpatient clinics and lack of capacity to see rheumatoid patients frequently for treatment escalation, we established a protocol-driven clinic run by a speciality doctor and nurse in 2010. All newly diagnosed patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis were seen on a 4-6 weekly basis by the team to escalate DMARD treatment according to disease activity as measured by DAS28-CRP.  To assess DAS28-CRP remission rate in this cohort of patients (after 1, 2 and 3 years of therapy). We also looked at rates of low disease activity (LDA) – DAS 28 CRP≥2.6 but≤3.2 and categorisation by DMARD monotherapy, combination therapy, or Biologic therapy.

Methods:

Treatment escalation was done by agreed departmental protocol which included oral Methotrexate (up to 25mg/week, followed by S/C injections if necessary). This was followed by addition of Hydroxychloroquine and then either Leflunomide or sulphasalazine if DAS28-CRP indicated activity. UK NICE guidelines allow use of Biologics if the DAS > 5.1 at 6 months, hence this was the next step followed on the protocol.  We collected additional outcome data for HAQ score, work stability data, and radiological erosion data. We have 331 patients through the clinic to date and present outcome data for those completing 1year (127), 2years (75) and 3years (36).

Results:

127 patients have completed 1year, of which 20% achieved DAS28 scores <3.2 (LDA) and 60% <2.6 (remission). 64% needed combination DMARD therapy and 7 patients (5.5%) needed biologics, 30% remaining on DMARD monotherapy at 1 year. Mean HAQ scores reduced from 1.1 (+-0.01) to 0.32 (+-0.07) and radiological erosions progressed in only 10%. Job retention at one year was 90%.

75 patients completed 2 years of follow-up, 68% in DAS-remission and 16% LDA. 8% are on Biologics at end of year 2, 32% on DMARD monotherapy.

36 patients completed 3 years follow-up, with LDA in 25% and remission 61%. At year 3, Biologics use is 5.5%, with DMARD monotherapy in 20%.

DAS28 remission is maintained at 60% over the course of the 3years, with LDA increasing from 20% to 25% at year3. The active group (>3.2 DAS <5.1) who do not satisfy NICE criteria for Biologics reduced from 20% (year1) to 14% (year 3) on combination DMARD therapy.

Conclusion:

Targeted protocol-driven treatment of early RA with rapid escalation of therapy using conventional DMARDs/biologics resulted in remission of 60% at 1 year and maintained remission of 68% and 61% at 2 and 3 years.  The DAS28 remission rates and other outcomes achieved in this relatively ‘routine’ clinic are comparable to results achieved in controlled clinical trials. The innovative use of limited human resources and clinic appointments has provided good outcomes for patients with potential savings in expenditure on Biologic therapy.

Table: Comparison between Disease activity and therapy on consecutive 3 years

 

 

 YEAR 1

(2011)

 YEAR 2

(2012)

 YEAR 3

(2013)

 

Total number of patient= n

N=127

N=75

N=36

Disease activity

Active

DAS-28 CRP > 3.2

26 (20%)

12 (16%)

5 (14%)

Therapy

Monotherapy

6 (23%) one patient not on DMARD

4 (33%)

0 (0%)

Combination

15 (58%)

5 (42%)

4 (80%)

Biologics

4 (15%)

3 (25%)

1 (20%)

Low

DAS-28 CRP ≥2.6 but ≤ 3.2

25 (20%)

12 (16%)

9 (25%)

Therapy

Monotherapy

9 (36%)

4 (33%)

1 (11%)

Combination

15 (60%)

7 (59%)

8 (89%)

Biologics

1 (4%)

1 (8%)

0 (0%)

Remission

DAS-28 CRP is < 2.6

76 (60%)

51 (68%)

22 (61%)

Therapy

Monotherapy

23 (30%)

16 (31%)

6 (27%)

Combination

51 (67%)

33 (65%)

15 (68%)

Biologics

2 (3%)

2 (4%)

1 (5%)


Disclosure:

M. Solaiman,
None;

O. Semenova,
None;

H. Thompson,
None;

J. Cunnington,
None;

E. Baguley,
None;

S. Kallankara,
None;

O. Ogunbambi,
None;

Y. Patel,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-in-routine-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology