ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2861

Treat-to-Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Level of Treatment Response Is Necessary By 3 Months in Order to Achieve the Treatment Target By 6 Months? Results from the Real Life NOR-DMARD Study

Vibeke Norvang1, Inge C Olsen2, Joseph Sexton1, Eirik K Kristianslund1, Till Uhlig1, Tore Kvien3, Daniel Aletaha4, Josef S. Smolen4 and Espen A. Haavardsholm1, 1Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Medical University Vienna, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: observation, outcomes and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects V: Predicting Treatment Response

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose : In a treat-to-target strategy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment adoptions are recommended in case of poor improvement in disease activity 3 months after initiating therapy with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), or if remission or low disease activity (LDA) has not been reached by 6 months.¹ A pooled analyses from several pivotal RCTs showed that RA patients who did not achieve a minor treatment response within 3 months were unlikely to reach the treatment target by 6 months.² We aimed to investigate which response levels at 3 months are predictive of achieving the treatment targets at 6 months in a routine clinical setting.

 

Methods : Data were provided by NOR-DMARD, a prospective, multicentre, observational study. We selected biological DMARD-naïve RA-patients enrolled in the period 2000-2012, who had at least moderate disease activity according to the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) when initiating therapy. All analyses were performed for the total group of included patients (n=1610), as well as for the following sub-groups: disease duration more/ less than 12 months (n=895/681), baseline SDAI moderate/ high disease activity (n=825/ 785), DMARD-naïve patients starting methotrexate (n=237) and biological DMARD-naïve patients starting a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (n=248). We used a diagnostic test approach with receiver operating characteristic curves to explore the association between SDAI 50/70/85 response at 3 months and achievement of the treatment targets of SDAI remission or SDAI LDA at 6 months.

 

Results: At inclusion mean (SD) SDAI was 28.3 (12.8) and median (25-75% percentile) disease duration was 2 (0.2-8.8) years. At 6 months 46.8% of all patients had achieved LDA and 10.8% had reached remission. Not achieving at least 50% SDAI response at 3 months was associated with failing to reach remission, with low negative likelihood ratios (LRs) for all analysed groups (LR- 0.15-0.36). Patients with high disease activity at baseline were likely to fail reaching remission at 6 months if they achieved less than SDAI 70% response at 3 months (LR- 0.25), and to not reach LDA if they achieved less than SDAI 50% response (LR- 0.30). Achieving SDAI 85% response at 3 months was associated with reaching the treatment targets in all analysed groups, with high positive LRs for both remission (LR+ 4.77-9.64) and LDA (LR+ 4.56-8.06).

 

 

Conclusion : These results from a routine clinical setting confirm results from RCTs demonstrating a predictive association between levels of treatment response at 3 months and achievement of the treatment target after 6 months in RA-patients. Assessments at 3 months can inform clinicians to continue or adjust ongoing DMARD-therapy in a treat-to-target strategy aiming for remission or LDA within 6 months.

References:

1.       Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017

2.       Aletaha D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016


Disclosure: V. Norvang, None; I. C. Olsen, Pfizer Inc, 5; J. Sexton, None; E. K. Kristianslund, None; T. Uhlig, None; T. Kvien, AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Janssen, Merck-Serono, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Oktal, Orion Pharma, Hospira/Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB., 5,AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Janssen, Merck-Serono, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Oktal, Orion Pharma, Hospira/Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB, 8; D. Aletaha, AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 5,AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 8; J. S. Smolen, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer Inc, Roche, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, GSK, ILTOO, Janssen, MedImmune, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, GSK, ILTOO, Janssen, MedImmune, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB, 8; E. A. Haavardsholm, AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Eli Lilly, Celgene, UCB, 5,AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Eli Lilly, Celgene, UCB, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Norvang V, Olsen IC, Sexton J, Kristianslund EK, Uhlig T, Kvien T, Aletaha D, Smolen JS, Haavardsholm EA. Treat-to-Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Level of Treatment Response Is Necessary By 3 Months in Order to Achieve the Treatment Target By 6 Months? Results from the Real Life NOR-DMARD Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-what-level-of-treatment-response-is-necessary-by-3-months-in-order-to-achieve-the-treatment-target-by-6-months-results-from-the-real-life-nor-dmard-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-what-level-of-treatment-response-is-necessary-by-3-months-in-order-to-achieve-the-treatment-target-by-6-months-results-from-the-real-life-nor-dmard-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology