ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1226

Transition Time to Osteoporosis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jiwon Hwang1, Joong Kyong Ahn2, Ji Young Chai3, Hoon-Suk Cha1, Jaejoon Lee1 and Eunmi Koh1, 1Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, 2Department of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, 3Division of Rheumatology, Jesang Hospital, Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone density, Osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Clinical Features & Comorbidity/Cardiovascular Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis. Although bone mineral density (BMD) testing is routinely performed in patients with RA, the optimal interval between BMD tests remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transition time to osteoporosis in RA patients with normal BMD and in those with osteopenia at baseline, and to estimate the optimal BMD testing interval.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 548 consecutive RA patients at a single tertiary hospital who underwent BMD testing on two or more occasions during October 1994 and December 2011. Patients were sorted into 5 groups; normal baseline BMD (T score, -1.00 or higher), mild osteopenia (T score, -1.01 to -1.49), moderate osteopenia (T score, -1.50 to -1.99), severe osteopenia (T score, -2.00 to -2.49) or osteoporosis (T score -2.50 or lower). The transition time to osteoporosis was defined as the estimated time for 10% of patients to make the transition to osteoporosis from normal BMD or from each subgroup of osteopenia. Risk factors for osteoporosis on initial BMD test were also assessed.

Results: Patients were mostly women (96.4%) and the mean age was 55.6 ± 10.6 years. The mean follow-up duration of RA was 8.8 ± 4.3 years. At initial visit, 9.1% of patients had a past history of steroid use for diseases other than RA. Rheumatoid factor was positive in 330 of 531 patients (62.1%) and anti-CCP antibodies in 138 of 206 patients (67%). The mean duration between the initial visit and the first BMD screening was 32.7 ± 40.2 months and the prevalence of osteoporosis was 31.7% at screening (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.6 to 36.1). Estimated transition time to osteoporosis was 72 months (95% CI 36 to 90) for patients with normal BMD, 62 months (95% CI 28 to 126) for patients with mild osteopenia, 34 months (95% CI 16 to 60) for patients with moderate osteopenia, and 17 months (95% CI 10 to 21) for patients with severe osteopenia. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for osteoporosis at initial BMD testing was high for older age (OR 1.066, 95% CI 1.029 to 1.105, p < 0.0001), past steroid use (OR 2.033, 95% CI 1.174 to 3.520, p = 0.0159), and current steroid use (OR 3.987, 95% CI 2.092 to 7.597, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Our data indicate that osteoporosis would develop in less than 10% of RA patients within 6 years for patients with normal bone density, 5 years for patients with mild osteopenia, 2.5 years for patient with moderate osteopenia, and 1 year for patients with advanced osteopenia at baseline. Therefore, the interval for rescreening BMD testing should be adjusted based on the initial BMD result in patients with RA.


Disclosure:

J. Hwang,
None;

J. K. Ahn,
None;

J. Y. Chai,
None;

H. S. Cha,
None;

J. Lee,
None;

E. Koh,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/transition-time-to-osteoporosis-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology