Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of Rituximab (RTX)in elderly (aged ≥ 65years) and younger patients (aged 18-64 years) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: We included all the RA patients in the «Auto-immunity and RTX » 7-years prospective registry with 2 years follow-up and divided them in 2 main groups on the basis of their age ( aged ≥ 65 and aged <65). A minor group with the very old patients ( 75years old or more) was studied too. The primary efficacy outcome was EULAR response (good, moderate and no response) , the secondary efficacy outcome were low disease activity and remission. The primary tolerance outcome was drug discontinuation rates due to side effects.
Results: Among the 1709 patients having at least 2 years of follow up, 608 were ≥ 65years of whom 191 were ≥ 75years old, and 1101 were <65years. At baseline, the elderly patients showed a longer disease duration, a higher rate of CRP and ESR (medians respectively 21 vs 14mg/L, p<0.001, and 35 vs 32 mm, p<0.001), lower rate of previous aTNF therapy (71% vs 79.6%, p<0.001) and lower number of aTNF previously used (medians 1 vs 2, p<0.001). Disease activity, previous DMARDs rates, rheumatoid or aCCP rates and corticotherapy (yes/no) were not statistically different between the 2 groups. At 24 months, no significant difference was showed between groups for RTX discontinuation rates for side effects: 5.8% if < 65years, 4.9% if ≥ 65 years and 4.2% if ≥ 75years old. However, death rates increased with age: 2.5% if < 65years, 7.7% if ≥ 65 years and 16.2% if ≥ 75years old, p<0.001.The EULAR response criteria were not statistically different after 2 years (n=506) in the younger (<65 years, n=354)and older groups (≥ 65years, n=152) with respectively 64.1% and 68.4% of responders including 39.5% and 48% moderate responders, and 24.6% and 20.4% good responders respectively. However, there were significant differences concerning very old patients (≥75ans). Before adjustment younger patients and patients between 65 and 75years had more chances to be good responders at one year follow-up (n=642) than patients ≥ 75years old, with respectively OR= 3.54 ( 95% IC= [1.2-10.47]) and OR= 4.53 (95 IC= [1.12-12.33]). After adjustment, this difference was only significant between the old (≥ 65years) and very old patients (≥ 75years): OR= 3.71, 95% IC= [1.12;12.33] (n= 475). At 24 months, these differences were no longer significant with or without adjustment. Concerning remission, there was no significant difference between the young and the elderly, either at 1 year or at 2 years, respectively 12.05% vs 13% (adjusted p=0.372) , and 15.6% vs 11.04% (adjusted p= 0.410).
Conclusion: This study is the first to date to compare tolerance and effectiveness of RTX between elderly and younger patients with RA. No significant difference in efficacy or discontinuation rate after 2 years of follow-up. Increase of mortality in the oldest patients is probably due to the decrease of life expectancy with age.
Disclosure:
S. Payet,
None;
J. E. Gottenberg,
None;
X. Mariette,
None;
P. Ravaud,
None;
E. Perrodeau,
None;
T. Bardin,
None;
P. Cacoub,
None;
A. G. Cantagrel,
Chugai, BMS, Roche, UCB, Abbott, Pfizer,
5,
UCB, Pfizer,
2;
B. Combe,
None;
M. Dougados,
None;
R. M. Flipo,
None;
B. Godeau,
None;
L. Guillevin,
None;
X. X. Le Loet,
None;
E. Hachulla,
None;
T. Schaeverbeke,
None;
J. Sibilia,
None;
I. Pane,
None;
G. Baron,
None;
M. Soubrier,
None.
« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tolerance-and-efficacy-of-rituximab-in-elderly-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-enrolled-in-the-french-society-of-rheumatology-air-registry/