ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0739

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis with ischemic vs non-ischemic manifestations

Carmen Secada-Gómez1, Javier Loricera2, Clara Moriano3, Santos Castañeda4, Javier Narváez5, Vicente Aldasoro Cáceres6, Olga Maiz7, Rafael B. Melero-González8, Paloma Vela Casasempere9, Susana Romero-Yuste10, Jose Luis Callejas11, Eugenio de Miguel12, Eva Galíndez Agirregoikoa13, Francisca Sivera14, Ivan Ferraz Amaro15, Julio Sánchez Martín16 and Ricardo Blanco1, 1Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Santander, Spain, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Santander , Spain, Santander, Spain, 3Hospital León, LEON, Castilla y Leon, Spain, 4Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 5Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 6Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, 7Hospital Universitario de Donosti, Donostia, Spain, 8COMPLEXO HOSPITALARIO UNIVERSITARIO DE OURENSE, O Carballino, Spain, 9Hospital General Universitario Alicante, Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 10University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain, 11Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital San Cecilio, Granada, Spain, 12Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 13BASURTO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, BILBAO, Spain, 14Hospital General Universitario Elda, Elda, Spain, 15Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 16Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, glucocorticoids, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0731–0764) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only approved biological drug in the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, there are no comparative studies on the efficacy of TCZ in patients with GCA with ischaemic vs. non-ischaemic manifestations. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of TCZ in patients with GCA with ischaemic vs. non-ischaemic manifestations in clinical practice.

Methods: Multicentre observational and comparative study of 471 patients with GCA treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: i) ACR criteria, and/or ii) temporal artery biopsy, and/or iii) imaging techniques. In this case, a comparative subanalysis between patients with GCA with ischaemic manifestations (visual involvement and/or jaw claudication and/or stroke) and those with GCA with non-ischaemic manifestations was done. Remission was considered according to EULAR definitions, as the absence of signs and symptoms of GCA and the normalization of the ESR and CRP values (1).

Results: The 471 patients with GCA were divided into 2 subgroups: a) GCA with ischaemic manifestations (n=162), and b) GCA with non-ischaemic manifestations (n=309) (TABLE). Patients with ischaemic manifestations were older, met ACR1990 criteria more often, had positive temporal biopsy more frequently and the time from diagnosis to onset of TCZ was shorter. The predominant phenotype in patients with ischaemic manifestations was cranial GCA and they presented more frequently hypertension and higher mean CRP and ESR values. The mean dose of prednisone was higher in this group, while concomitant use with a conventional synthetic DMARD was more frequent in the non-ischaemic group.No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of remission except within the 6 months of starting TCZ, which was higher in the non-ischaemic group (FIGURE). Glucocorticoid dose was higher in the GCA group with ischaemic manifestations during the first 3 months, but was similar in both groups thereafter.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of TCZ appears to be similar in patients with GCA with ischaemic and in patients with non-ischaemic manifestations, although in the latter group combined treatment was more frequent.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2TABLE. Main features of GCA patients with and without ischaemic manifestations treated with tocilizumab.


Disclosures: C. Secada-Gómez: None; J. Loricera: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; C. Moriano: None; S. Castañeda: None; J. Narváez: None; V. Aldasoro Cáceres: None; O. Maiz: None; R. Melero-González: None; P. Vela Casasempere: None; S. Romero-Yuste: AbbVie, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Eli Lilly & Co., 2, 6, Galapagos, 6, UCB, 2; J. Callejas: None; E. de Miguel: AbbVie, 1, 5, 6, BMS, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 6, Grunenthal, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, MSD, 6, Novartis, 1, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 5, 6, Roche, 5, 6, Sanofi, 6, UCB, 6; E. Galíndez Agirregoikoa: None; F. Sivera: None; I. Ferraz Amaro: None; J. Sánchez Martín: None; R. Blanco: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Secada-Gómez C, Loricera J, Moriano C, Castañeda S, Narváez J, Aldasoro Cáceres V, Maiz O, Melero-González R, Vela Casasempere P, Romero-Yuste S, Callejas J, de Miguel E, Galíndez Agirregoikoa E, Sivera F, Ferraz Amaro I, Sánchez Martín J, Blanco R. Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis with ischemic vs non-ischemic manifestations [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tocilizumab-in-giant-cell-arteritis-with-ischemic-vs-non-ischemic-manifestations/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tocilizumab-in-giant-cell-arteritis-with-ischemic-vs-non-ischemic-manifestations/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology