ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1452

Timing of Decisions to Adjust Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients with Active Disease in a Usual Practice Setting

Yomei Shaw1, Chung-Chou H. Chang2, Marc C. Levesque3, Julie M. Donohue4, Kaleb Michaud5,6 and Mark S. Roberts1, 1Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Health Policy & Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 5National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, 6Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, DMARDs, outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ARHP): Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Current guidelines recommend that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with poor response to their current regimen of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have therapy adjusted until reaching low disease activity or remission. We examined factors associated with timing of decisions to adjust DMARD therapy for RA patients with active disease and how the timing of decisions impacts resolution of active disease.

Methods:

Data came from the University of Pittsburgh Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparative Effectiveness Research (RACER) registry, which captures subjects’ disease activity status (DAS28-CRP) and medications at clinic visits.

We conducted survival analyses on time to DMARD therapy adjustment and time to resolution of active disease for RACER subjects with active disease. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the impact of covariates on the survival times. For both analyses, followup begins when the subject is first known to have active disease (DAS28-CRP>3.2) and ends with the event of interest (DMARD therapy adjustment or resolution of active disease). For the analysis of time to therapy adjustment, we excluded patients who adjusted therapy at t=0 and those who exited active disease before adjusting therapy, and the model included covariates for age, gender, African-American race, comorbidities, duration of RA, and current use of a biologic therapy. For the analysis of time to resolution of active disease, the model included the same covariates plus an indicator for time to therapy adjustment.

Results:

We identified 562 subjects with active disease at a first timepoint and a followup DAS28-CRP measurement.

The analysis for time to therapy adjustment included 177 subjects (117 therapy augmentations observed). 364 subjects were excluded because they adjusted DMARD therapy at t=0 (n=196) or because they exited active disease status before adjusting therapy (n=162). The median time to therapy adjustment was 203 days. Age over 75 and longer duration of RA were significantly associated with longer times to therapy adjustment.

The analysis for time to resolution of active disease included 530 subjects (383 achieved DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2). The median time to resolution of active disease was 257 days. African-American race and duration of RA >1 year were associated with longer times to resolution of active disease. (See Table 1)

Conclusion:

Among those with persistent active disease (n=394), 60% adjusted DMARD therapy within 90 days; however 50% of subjects took longer than 257 days to achieve DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2. We found that age ≥ 75 and longer duration of RA were associated with longer times to DMARD therapy adjustment, while African-American race and duration of RA > 1 year were associated with poorer disease outcomes.  Future studies should further examine how these factors affect treatment choices as well as long term health outcomes.

 

 


Disclosure:

Y. Shaw,
None;

C. C. H. Chang,
None;

M. C. Levesque,
None;

J. M. Donohue,
None;

K. Michaud,
None;

M. S. Roberts,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/timing-of-decisions-to-adjust-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drug-dmard-therapy-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-patients-with-active-disease-in-a-usual-practice-setting/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology