ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1838

Time to Flare in Patients with New-Onset versus Relapsing Giant Cell Arteritis Treated with Tocilizumab or Placebo Plus Prednisone Tapering: 3-Year Results from a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial

John Stone1, Helen Spotswood 2, Sebastian Unizony 1, Martin Aringer 3, Daniel Blockmans 4, Elisabeth Brouwer 5, Maria C. Cid 6, Bhaskar Dasgupta 7, Jürgen Rech 8, Carlo Salvarani 9, Robert Spiera 10 and Min Bao 11, 1Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Unit, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Roche Products, Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Dresden, Germany, 4Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, 5Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 6Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain, 7Southend University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom, 8Department of Internal Medicine 3, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, 9Division of Rheumatology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 10Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 11Genentech, South San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: tocilizumab and giant cell arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M098: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders II: Large Vessel Vasculitis Treatment (1836–1841)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Tocilizumab (TCZ) administered subcutaneously every week (QW) or every other week (Q2W) with 26-week prednisone tapering was superior to placebo (PBO) plus 26-week (PBO+26) or 52-week (PBO+52) prednisone tapering for achievement of sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in part 1 of the 52-week, double-blind GiACTA trial.1 In part 1, among patients with new-onset GCA at baseline, TCZ QW and TCZ Q2W treatment reduced the risk for GCA flare compared with PBO+26, whereas among patients with relapsing GCA, TCZ QW but not TCZ Q2W treatment reduced the risk for flare compared with both PBO groups, and there was separation in the time to flare between the TCZ QW and Q2W groups. The objective of the current analysis was to report time to first flare over 3 years of the GiACTA trial (part 1 plus 2-year open-label part 2) among patients with new-onset or relapsing GCA.

Methods: At the end of part 1, patients entered open-label part 2, in which GCA therapy (including initiation/termination of open-label TCZ and/or glucocorticoids) was given at the investigator’s discretion according to disease status. Time to first GCA disease flare during the 3-year study period was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis for patients in the intent-to-treat population according to disease onset status at baseline (new-onset or relapsing) based on their originally assigned treatment groups: TCZ QW, TCZ Q2W, or pooled PBO (PBO+26 and PBO+52).

Results: Among patients randomly assigned in part 1, 47 of 100 (47%) in the TCZ QW group, 26 of 49 (53%) in the TCZ Q2W group, and 46 of 101 (46%) in the pooled PBO group had new-onset GCA at baseline; the rest had relapsing GCA. Median time to first flare over 3 years was longer for patients assigned to TCZ treatment in part 1 than for those assigned to PBO. Among patients assigned to TCZ, it was longer with QW than Q2W dosing for both the new-onset and the relapsing subgroups (Table 1). Higher proportions of patients in the TCZ QW group (new-onset, 49%; relapsing, 47%) than the pooled PBO group (new-onset, 28%; relapsing, 31%) and the TCZ Q2W group (new-onset, 27%; relapsing, 35%) remained flare-free during the entire 3-year study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a clear separation between the TCZ QW and pooled PBO groups over 3 years for patients with new-onset and relapsing GCA (Figure 1). Separation between the TCZ QW and TCZ Q2W groups was also observed over 3 years in patients with new-onset and relapsing GCA, although this was more evident in patients with new-onset GCA during year 3 (Figure 2).

Conclusion: In this 3-year analysis of GiACTA parts 1 and 2, time to first flare favored TCZ QW over TCZ Q2W in patients with new-onset and relapsing GCA. TCZ QW delayed time to first flare compared with PBO in patients with new-onset and relapsing GCA, supporting TCZ QW dosing in patients with GCA regardless of disease onset.  

References: 1. Stone JH et al N Engl J Med 2017;377:317-328.


Disclosure: J. Stone, Genentech, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Xencor, 2, 5; H. Spotswood, Roche, 1, 3; S. Unizony, Genentech, Inc., 2; M. Aringer, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Hexal, 8, HEXAL, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, 8, UCB, 8; D. Blockmans, None; E. Brouwer, Roche, 5, 8; M. Cid, Roche, 9; B. Dasgupta, Abbvie, 2, BMS, 5, GSK, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Roche Chugai, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, Sanofi Aventis, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 5; J. Rech, AbbVie, 8, Biogen, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, MSD, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Roche, 5; C. Salvarani, None; R. Spiera, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, ChemoCentryx, 2, 5, Chemocentryx, 2, Corbus, 2, CSL Behring, 5, Cytori, 2, Formation Biologics, 2, Genentech, Inc., 2, Genzyme/Sanofi, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 2, Janssen, 5, Mitsubishi, 5, Roche, 2, Roche Genetech, 2, 5, Roche/Genetech, 2, 5, Roche-Genentech, 2, 5, Roche-Genetech, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 5; M. Bao, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3, Roche, 4.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stone J, Spotswood H, Unizony S, Aringer M, Blockmans D, Brouwer E, Cid M, Dasgupta B, Rech J, Salvarani C, Spiera R, Bao M. Time to Flare in Patients with New-Onset versus Relapsing Giant Cell Arteritis Treated with Tocilizumab or Placebo Plus Prednisone Tapering: 3-Year Results from a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/time-to-flare-in-patients-with-new-onset-versus-relapsing-giant-cell-arteritis-treated-with-tocilizumab-or-placebo-plus-prednisone-tapering-3-year-results-from-a-randomized-controlled-phase-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/time-to-flare-in-patients-with-new-onset-versus-relapsing-giant-cell-arteritis-treated-with-tocilizumab-or-placebo-plus-prednisone-tapering-3-year-results-from-a-randomized-controlled-phase-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology