ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1039

Through the LuCIN Lens: Defining Barriers and Forging Solutions for Lupus Clinical Trials in North America

Brandon Jackson1, Maria Dall'Era2, Saira Sheikh3, Xueting Zhang4, Taylor Irons5, Jennifer Meriwether6, Maya Merrell1 and Stacie Bell7, 1Lupus Research Alliance / Lupus Therapeutics, Miami, FL, 2UCSF, Corte Madera, CA, 3University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 4Weill Cornell, New York, NY, 5Lupus Research Alliance / Lupus Therapeutics, Houston, 6Lupus Research Alliance / Lupus Therapeutics, New York, NY, 7Lupus Therapeutics, Lakewood, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, Health Services Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus Therapeutics (LT), the clinical affiliate of the Lupus Research Alliance, oversees the Lupus Clinical Investigators Network (LuCIN), a network of premier research sites in North America formed to accelerate and improve the conduct of clinical trials for the development of new therapies. An annual survey of LuCIN investigators and research teams aims to define and assess challenges and solutions to conducting lupus clinical trials.

Methods: The 2024 LuCIN annual survey collected data from January 7 to February 18, 2024. Questions focused on assessing views of challenges and solutions for conducting lupus clinical trials in North America. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey responses.

Results: 124 lupus clinical trial site staff surveyed Figure 1, revealed 74% appreciate increased access to sponsored clinical trials and high-quality clinical trial opportunities provided by LT. Still, only 28% of respondents feel adequately compensated for time and effort on clinical trials and 44% have renewed identical training for sponsors within the last 12 months. Contracting negotiations are often delayed by institutional required language, affecting most respondents for 1-3+ months Figure 1. Feedback delays during start-up activities are mostly from Institutional Departments (58%) and the Sponsor (49%), notably LT (2%) and others Figure 1. 114 investigators and coordinators work mostly within Rheumatology (91%) and Dermatology (23%), collaborate most frequently with Nephrology (77%), Dermatology (72%), and Oncology/Hematology (57%). Respondents had an average of 17 years of experience with lupus patients, managing 8 clinical trials on average and almost half (45%) agreed they were at capacity for clinical trials Figure 2. Survey respondents describe restrictive trial eligibility criteria (83%) as a major recruitment challenge and outlined design preferences Figure 2. Over half (54%) agreed that the availability of approved medications deters participant clinical trial interest, and 70% say prior use of treatments for lupus leads to participant exclusion. Nearly half of the 69 investigators (45%) report a shortage of research coordinators to enable study participation due to various reasons Figure 3.

Conclusion: Feedback from lupus trial centers in North America underscores the need to address challenges in clinical trial conduct and design to enable better support for site teams, especially research coordinators. The responses indicate an appreciation for the enhanced access to high quality clinical trials afforded by being part of a structured clinical trials network. Further efforts are needed to streamline processes, provide better support for site staff, and establish easy methods to accept institutional required language and prior training. Further research should address interdepartmental collaborations given the growing cell therapy landscape, alongside evaluating flexible trial designs to improve recruitment and manage a high workload effectively. These insights allow for better support and function of clinical network centers that ultimately benefit those impacted by lupus by accelerating lupus trials and treatment development.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1

Supporting image 2

Figure 2

Supporting image 3

Figure 3


Disclosures: B. Jackson: None; M. Dall'Era: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Genentech, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2; S. Sheikh: AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 2, Cabaletta Bio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2; X. Zhang: None; T. Irons: None; J. Meriwether: None; M. Merrell: None; S. Bell: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jackson B, Dall'Era M, Sheikh S, Zhang X, Irons T, Meriwether J, Merrell M, Bell S. Through the LuCIN Lens: Defining Barriers and Forging Solutions for Lupus Clinical Trials in North America [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/through-the-lucin-lens-defining-barriers-and-forging-solutions-for-lupus-clinical-trials-in-north-america/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/through-the-lucin-lens-defining-barriers-and-forging-solutions-for-lupus-clinical-trials-in-north-america/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology