ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2870

Thresholds for Disease Activity Measures DAS28, CDAI, and RAPID3 Do Not Align with Clinical Practice Patterns of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease Management Decisions

Brian C. Sauer1, Chia-Chen Teng, MS1, Neil A. Accortt2, David H. Collier2, Tzu-Chieh Lin2 and Grant W. Cannon1, 1Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical practice, Disease Activity, registry, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T108 ACR Abstract: RA–DX, Manifestations, & Outcomes V: Outcomes Measures (2868–2873)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:   Treatment guidelines recommend using disease activity measures (DAMs) to guide RA therapy, but DAM use in real-world treatment decisions is not defined.  We compared frequency of major therapeutic change (MTC) across disease activity categories for 3 DAMs (Disease Activity Score with 28 joints [DAS28], Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI], Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]); explored ability of DAMs to discriminate between patients with/without MTC; and identified DAM thresholds to optimize discriminant ability.

Methods:   US Veterans enrolled in Veterans Administration RA registry (VARA) had: visit with complete set of DAMs (index date); 2 additional visits ≥60 days apart during 18-month pre-index period; clinical data available 18 months before through 30 days after index date were eligible.  MTC was assessed 1 week before through 30 days after index, defined as: initiation of synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (sDMARD, bDMARD); DMARD dose escalation ≥25%; prednisone use (new agent or after 90-day gap); prednisone dose increased 25%; and/or corticosteroid injection in ≥2 joints.  Sensitivity and specificity for disease category to predict MTC was calculated for each DAM.  Youden’s Index (sensitivity + specificity – 1) was used to determine thresholds at which providers were likely to initiate MTC.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess discrimination thresholds.

Results:   For 1,776 patients (12,094 visits), 89% were male, mean RA disease duration was 13.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.8, 13.9), and mean age of 63.4 years (95% CI 62.9, 63.9).  Positive associations between disease activity level and MTC proportion were observed (Table 1).  Most MTCs occurred with sDMARDs (Table 2).  Empiric thresholds (highest Youden Indices) (95% CI) were DAS28: 4.02 (3.70, 4.36); CDAI: 12.9 (10.6, 15.1); RAPID3: 3.81 (3.32, 4.30) (Figure).

Conclusion:   Decision points for MTC per Youden Index thresholds were higher than moderate disease activity definitions, suggesting disease activity stratification is not aligned with physician practice.  MTC based on DAS28 and CDAI were driven by changes in sDMARDs. Physician-driven DAMs (DAS28, CDAI) had better discriminant abilities than patient-driven RAPID3.

 

Table 1.  Frequency of MTC Stratified by DAM Category

 

Visits with MTC, n/N (%)

 

DAS28

CDAI

RAPID3

High disease activity

890/1,986 (44.8%)

1,115/2,504 (44.5%)

1,849/5,596 (33.1%)

Moderate disease activity

1,342/4,853 (27.7%)

1,094/3,998 (27.4%)

792/3,802 (20.8%)

Low disease activity

381/2,059 (18.5%)

664/4,141 (16.0%)

258/1,513 (17.1%)

Remission

464/3,196 (14.5%)

204/1,451 (14.1%)

178/1,184 (15.0%)

n, number of visits with MTC; N, number of visits with DAM recorded

 

Table 2.  Type of MTC Stratified by DAM Category

 

 

Visits with MTC, n (%)

DAM and disease activity level

N

Initiated, changed, or escalated dose of sDMARD

Initiated, changed, or escalated dose of bDMARD

Initiated, changed, or escalated dose of prednisone

Prednisone joint injections

DAS28

 

 

 

 

 

High

1,986

498 (25.1%)

276 (13.9%)

173 (8.7%)

21 (1.1%)

Moderate

4,853

758 (15.6%)

309 (6.4%)

219 (4.5%)

33 (0.7%)

Low

2,059

221 (10.7%)

58 (2.8%)

66 (3.2%)

5 (0.3%)

Remission

3,196

212 6.6%)

90 (2.8%)

114 (3.6%)

5 (0.2%)

CDAI

 

 

 

 

 

High

2,504

632 (25.2%)

346 (13.8%)

197 (7.9%)

27 (1.1%)

Moderate

3,998

616 (15.4%)

226 (5.7%)

202 (5.1%)

25 (0.6%)

Low

4,141

352 (8.5%)

113 (2.7%)

123 (3.0%)

12 (0.3%)

Remission

1,451

89 (6.1%)

48 (3.3%)

50 (3.5%)

0

RAPID3

 

 

 

 

 

High

5,595

981 (17.6%)

491 (8.8%)

351 (6.3%)

51 (0.9%)

Moderate

3,802

472 (12.4%)

150 (4.0%)

141 (3.7%)

10 (0.3%)

Low

1,513

146 (9.6%)

56 (3.7%)

40 (2.6%)

2 (0.1%)

Remission

1,184

90 (7.6%)

36 (3.0%)

40 (3.4%)

1 (0.1%)

n, number of visits with MTC; N, number of visits with disease activity recorded


Disclosure: B. C. Sauer, Amgen Inc., 2; C. C. Teng, MS, Amgen Inc., 2; N. A. Accortt, Amgen Inc., 1,Amgen Inc., 3; D. H. Collier, Amgen Inc., 1,Amgen Inc., 3; T. C. Lin, Amgen Inc., 1,Amgen Inc., 3; G. W. Cannon, Amgen Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sauer BC, Teng MS CC, Accortt NA, Collier DH, Lin TC, Cannon GW. Thresholds for Disease Activity Measures DAS28, CDAI, and RAPID3 Do Not Align with Clinical Practice Patterns of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease Management Decisions [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/thresholds-for-disease-activity-measures-das28-cdai-and-rapid3-do-not-align-with-clinical-practice-patterns-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-disease-management-decisions/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/thresholds-for-disease-activity-measures-das28-cdai-and-rapid3-do-not-align-with-clinical-practice-patterns-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-disease-management-decisions/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology