ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1442

Three-Year Drug Survival and Effectiveness Of Abatacept and Tocilizumab In Patients with  Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated In Routine Care. Results From The Nationwide Danish Danbio Registry

HCB Leffers1,2, Mikkel Østergaard3, Bente Glintborg4, Niels Steen Krogh5, Ulrik Tarp6, Tove Lorenzen7, Annette Hansen8, Lene Dreyer9 and Merete L. Hetland3, 1DANBIO, On behalf of Depts of Rheumatology, North, South, Central, Zealand and Capital Region, Glostrup, Denmark, 2Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frderiksberg, Denmark, 3Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark, 5ZiteLab ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 7Department of Rheumatology, Region Hospital Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark, 8Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 9Internal Medicine - Rheumatology Section, Copenhagen University Hospital at Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Abatacept, biologic drugs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Treatment with abatacept and tocilizumab has been shown to be efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients refractory to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). However, reports on long term effectiveness in clinical practice are scarce. In this extension of previously published 48-week data1, we aimed to describe three-year drug survival and clinical response in RA patients treated with abatacept or tocilizumab in routine care, based on data from the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry 

Methods:

In the DANBIO registry we identified 341 RA patients treated with abatacept and 790 RA patients treated with tocilizumab. The clinical effectiveness was assessed by drug survival and by changes since baseline in DAS28 and EULAR response rates after 48, 96 and 144 weeks. No imputation of missing values was done. No direct comparison of the 2 drugs was made.

Results:

Of the patients receiving abatacept or tocilizumab, respectively, 20%/25% (abatacept/tocilizumab) were male, median (interquartile range, IQR) age 55(47-64)/58(47-66) years, disease duration 4(1-11)/4(1-12) years and number of previous biological drugs 3(2-4)/2(2-3), >90%/>90% of patients, had previously received ≥1 TNFi.

After 48, 96 and 144 weeks, the drug adherence to abatacept was 47%, 35% and 28% and to tocilizumab it was 61%, 54% and 47% (figure).

Median DAS28 at baseline, week 48, week 96 and week 144 in the abatacept group was 5.1, 3.3, 2.8 and 2.7 respectively, and 5.1, 2.6, 2.6 and 2.2 in the tocilizumab group.

At week 48, 96 and 144, the remission rates were 26%, 41% and 48% for abatacept and 47%, 45% and 63% for tocilizumab. Rates of good-or-moderate EULAR response at week 48, 96 and 144 was 76%, 79% and 85% for abatacept and 82%, 85% and 91% for tocilizumab. Response rates after correction for proportion of patients still on drug (LUNDEX values2) are presented in figure 1.

Conclusion:

In this study of RA patients whereof >90% were previous TNFi failures, 28% of patients who started abatacept and 47% who started tocilizumab still received the drug after 144 weeks. Good-or-moderate EULAR response was seen in the majority (85%-91%) of patients who still received the drugs after 144 weeks, reflecting that almost all patients with poor response was withdrawn from therapy. Due to the non-randomised study design, no direct comparison of the drugs was made.

Reference List

    1.    Leffers HC, Ostergaard M, Glintborg B et al. Efficacy of abatacept and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in clinical practice: results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(7):1216-1222.

    2.    Kristensen LE, Saxne T, Geborek P. The LUNDEX, a new index of drug efficacy in clinical practice: results of a five-year observational study of treatment with infliximab and etanercept among rheumatoid arthritis patients in southern Sweden. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54(2):600-606.


Disclosure:

H. Leffers,
None;

M. Østergaard,

Abbott, Pfizer, Centocor,

2,

Abbott Pfizer, Merck, Roche, UCB,

5,

Abbott, Pfizer, Merck, BMS, UCB, Mundipharma,

8;

B. Glintborg,
None;

N. S. Krogh,
None;

U. Tarp,
None;

T. Lorenzen,

Phizer, Roche,

6;

A. Hansen,

UCB, ABBVIE and MSD,

5;

L. Dreyer,
None;

M. L. Hetland,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Abbott, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, UCB,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/three-year-drug-survival-and-effectiveness-of-abatacept-and-tocilizumab-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-in-routine-care-results-from-the-nationwide-danish-danbio-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology