ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1146

Therapy of Lupus Nephritis with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Routine Clinical Practice: Response Rates and Role of Ethnicity

Prathima Anandi 1, Alyson Dickson 2, Vivian Kawai 2, C. Michael Stein 2 and Cecilia Chung3, 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, 2Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 3Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: lupus nephritis and health disparities, mycophenolate mofetil, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Healthcare Disparities In Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Randomized clinical trials have reported that 56-68% of patients with lupus nephritis treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) respond to therapy, and a randomized clinical trial has suggested that African-American patients respond better to MMF than Caucasians. However, data on rates and the role of ethnicity on MMF response in routine clinical practice are limited. As part of initial efforts to improve prediction models and personalized medicine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we calculated the response rate and defined the role of ethnicity on response to MMF in patients with lupus nephritis at a tertiary center.

Methods: This is a retrospective study using a de-identified version of patients’ electronic health records (EHR) at a University-based Medical Center. We completed EHR review and identified a cohort of patients who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosed with lupus nephritis; (2) received treatment with MMF for lupus nephritis; (3) were new users of MMF; and (4) had laboratory data available at baseline. All patients had confirmed diagnoses of SLE by clinical record review; they also presented with proteinuria (urine protein-to-creatinine ratio or 24-hour proteinuria >0.5 g/g or g/d, respectively) or a renal biopsy indicating lupus nephritis. Response was defined as: (1) a decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) to < 3.0 g/g in patients with baseline nephrotic range uPCR (≥3.0 g/g), or by ≥50% in patients with sub-nephrotic baseline uPCR (< 3.0 g/g); and (2) stabilization (±25%) or improvement in serum creatinine at six month. For patients who were lost to follow up prior to six months, we used the last observation carried forward as a method of imputing missing data. Univariate analysis was calculated using Fisher’s exact text. To adjust for multiple potential confounders, we used propensity scores including age, baseline creatinine, calendar year, baseline proteinuria, use of hydroxychloroquine, use of methylprednisolone, use of prednisone, and history of prior immunosuppressant use.

Results: 93 patients met inclusion criteria; 31 (33%) were African-American, and 62 (67%) reported a different race or did not report race. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. A total of 32 (34.4%) patients were classified as MMF responders and 61(65.6%) as non-responders. Among African-American patients, the response rate was 25.8%; among other patients, it was 38.7% (p=0.25). After adjusting for the propensity score and sex, African-American patients had lower odds of responding to MMF than patients from other races [OR: 0.34, 95% CI (0.11 – 0.99) p=0.049].

Conclusion: A total of 34% patients with lupus nephritis responded to MMF at six months of treatment in routine clinical practice at a tertiary center. Our results suggest that—in contrast to what has been reported in a previous randomized control clinical trial—African-American patients with lupus nephritis had lower odds of responding to MMF than patients who reported other races.


MMF-LN-Table1

Table 1: Comparison of Clinical Variables by Race


MMF-LN-Table 2

Table 2: Multivariate Analysis


Disclosure: P. Anandi, NIH/NIGMS T32 GM007569, 2, NIH/NIIMS T32AR059039-06A1, 2; A. Dickson, None; V. Kawai, NIH K23GM117395, 2, NIH NIGMS K23GM117395, 2, NIH/NIGMS K23GM117395, 2, NIH, 2, NIH, 2; C. Stein, None; C. Chung, NIH grant RC2GM092618 from NIGMS/OD, 2, NIH grant U01HG004603 from NHGRI/NIGMS, 2, NIH: R01GM126535 and R01 bridge award, 2, Rheumatology Research Foundation K-supplement, 2, Vanderbilt National Center for Advancing Translational Science grant 2UL1 TR000445-06 from NCATS/NIH, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Anandi P, Dickson A, Kawai V, Stein C, Chung C. Therapy of Lupus Nephritis with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Routine Clinical Practice: Response Rates and Role of Ethnicity [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapy-of-lupus-nephritis-with-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-routine-clinical-practice-response-rates-and-role-of-ethnicity/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapy-of-lupus-nephritis-with-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-routine-clinical-practice-response-rates-and-role-of-ethnicity/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology