ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1583

Therapist and Patient Perspectives On Exercise Adherence: Are We On the Same Page?

Jill R. Blitz1, Talitha Cox2 and Amber Richards3, 1Rehab Services, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 2Rehabilitation Services, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 3Rehab Services, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles California, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: exercise, Occupational therapy, pediatric rheumatology and physical therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Exercise is essential to the health and function of children with chronic diseases. Patient adherence to home exercise programs has long been an obstacle for physical and occupational therapists.

Objectives: 1.To compare the perceptions of patient adherence to home exercise programs between therapists and patients. 2. To compare differences between the perceptions of rheumatology patients and patients with other diagnoses. 3. To gain a better understanding of the barriers to exercise and tools used to overcome these barriers in a pediatric physical and occupational therapy setting.

Methods: A survey was administered to physical and occupational therapists who work at a pediatric tertiary care facility.  A similar survey was given to outpatients receiving physical and/or occupational therapy at the same facility, and patients seen in the Rheumatology clinic. The surveys included demographic information, frequency of exercise and a list of barriers and facilitators to choose from.  Fisher’s exact statistical analysis was used to compare responses of rheumatology patients versus non-rheumatology patients.

Results:   70 patients were surveyed; 36 from the outpatient physical and occupational therapy department and 34 from the Rheumatology clinic.  The average age was 13.5(SD 3.8).  31 therapists completed the survey.

 67% of therapists recommend that patients do their exercises every day, 20% 5x/week and 10% 3x/week.  40% of patients reported being noncompliant, 30% reported doing their exercises 5-7x/week, 20% reported 3-4x/week and 10% 1-2x/week.

The top cited barriers that therapists reported were patients’ lack of interest, forgetting to do their exercises and lack of family support.  Top cited barriers for patients included pain, forgetting to do their exercises and boredom. For facilitators, therapists felt that making age and developmentally appropriate exercises, a written home exercise program and family /community based activities were most helpful.  Patients chose participating in sports or dance, integrating exercise into daily life and exercising with family as the most important facilitators of adherence.

There were no statistically significant differences in responses between rheumatology and non-rheumatology patients (p> 0.05).

Conclusion:   Therapists and patients have different perspectives on adherence to exercise, but also agree on some aspects.  The reasons for adherence or non-adherence were not dependent on diagnosis.  Consideration of patients’ perceived barriers and facilitators when planning home exercise programs may improve patients’ adherence.


Disclosure:

J. R. Blitz,
None;

T. Cox,
None;

A. Richards,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapist-and-patient-perspectives-on-exercise-adherence-are-we-on-the-same-page/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology