ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0601

The “Why” of Drug Discontinuation; Clinical Review of EMR Notes for 2,545 Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Kent Kwas Huston1, Simon Helfgott2, Scott Milligan3, Jasvinder Singh4, Nehad Soloman5, Brandon Weil3 and Colin Edgerton6, 1Kansas City Physician Partners, Kansas City, MO, 2BWH- HMS, Boston, MA, 3Trio Health, Louisville, CO, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C., Peoria, AZ, 6Articularis Healthcare, Summerville, SC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Biologicals, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), registry

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Persistence on therapy is an important consideration in rheumatic diseases. There are multiple treatment options that influence long term disease management and a better understanding of the causes for medication discontinuation are needed. Possible reasons for discontinuation may be inferred from fielded data, when present, in EMR, claims, or specialty pharmacy records; however, actual reasons may be different. We reviewed open text notes within the EMR to understand why drugs were discontinued for patients with rheumatic diseases.

Methods: The ARN-TRIO Rheumatology registry contains EMR (fielded and open text), lab, procedure, infusion, medical claims, and specialty pharmacy data generated in care of >75,000 patients by ARN, a network of independent practices with >200 rheumatologists across the US. Data present in open text notes are extracted by clinically trained scribes who review the full patient histories for each patient and collect supplemental information into customized data forms. The collected data undergo a two-level audit process. Open text notes assessed were those specific to patients who discontinued csDMARD and/or targeted immune modulating drugs (TIM) between 2015 to 2019. Only the last discontinuation event per patient drug was considered for this study. Comparisons were made using chi-square with column proportions compared by z-test.

Results: Open text notes were reviewed for 2545 patients receiving 3616 regimens for which 4027 drugs were discontinued. Study population characteristics: 75% (1918) female, 77% (1325/1712) white, mean (range) age 57 (18-89), 67% (1706) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Reasons for discontinuation differed by drug type. [FIGURE 1] Perceived association or complication with one or more medical conditions was most commonly indicated for csDMARDs (44% [725/1644]) with 49% (350/715) indicated as gastrointestinal. [FIGURE 2] Lack or loss of efficacy was listed as the predominant reason for TIM discontinuation (53% [1260/2382]). To assess alignment of fielded data with recorded discontinuation reasons within the notes, we examined disease activity scores (RAPID3 or CDAI [DAS]) closest but preceding drug discontinuation for the subset of patients with RA. Of 2780 drug discontinuations, DAS were recorded for 73% (2042); 68% (1891) within 6 months prior to discontinuation. For TIM (but not for csDMARD discontinuations), DAS scores were significantly different for those indicated as “lack or loss of efficacy” v. not. [FIGURE 3] Approximately 15% (TIM) and 16% (csDMARD) of discontinuations indicated as “lack or loss of efficacy” had near remission or low DAS.

Conclusion: Actual reasons for discontinuation may be directionally aligned with recorded data in the EMR, though the lack of fielded data for ~30% of evaluated discontinued drugs limits full understanding of what drives drug discontinuation. In addition, reported data that would appear to be at odds with the discontinuation reason suggest that other measures or inputs may contribute to how physicians or patients define successful treatment. To fully understand care, ongoing chart review along with full data extraction are necessary.

FIGURE 1: Reasons for discontinuation by type of discontinued drug. An individual patient may have >1 discontinuation reason

FIGURE 2: Systems indicated when discontinuation associated with 1 or more medical condition

FIGURE 3: Distribution of DAS scores by discontinued drug type and reason of loss/lack of efficacy v. not in patients with RA. * indicates proportions that are significantly different (p < 0.05)


Disclosure: K. Huston, None; S. Helfgott, Abbvie, 5; S. Milligan, Gilead, 2; J. Singh, Crealta/Horizon, 1, Medisys, 1, Fidia, 1, UBM LLC, 1, Trio health, 1, Medscape, 1, WebMD, 1, Clinical Care options, 1, Clearview healthcare partners, 1, Putnam associates, 1, Focus forward, 1, Navigant consulting, 1, Spherix, 1, Practice Point communications, 1, the National Institutes of Health, 1, the American College of Rheumatology, 1, Amarin pharmaceuticals, 1, Viking therapeutics, 1, OMERACT, 1; N. Soloman, Horizon, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Jannsen, 2, 8, Pfizer, 8, Lilly, 2, GSK, 2, 5, 8; B. Weil, None; C. Edgerton, Sandoz, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Huston K, Helfgott S, Milligan S, Singh J, Soloman N, Weil B, Edgerton C. The “Why” of Drug Discontinuation; Clinical Review of EMR Notes for 2,545 Patients with Rheumatic Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-why-of-drug-discontinuation-clinical-review-of-emr-notes-for-2545-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-why-of-drug-discontinuation-clinical-review-of-emr-notes-for-2545-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology