ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1395

The Validation of a New Simple Disease Activity Tool in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): The Lupus Activity Scoring Tool (LAST) As Compared to the Sledai Selena Modification

Majed M. Khraishi1, Rana Aslanov2 and Krista Fudge3, 1Nexus Clinical Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St Johns, NF, Canada, 2Clinical Epidemiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.John's, NF, Canada, 3Medical Consultants of West Newfoundland, Western Memorial Hospital, Corner Brook, NF, Canada

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease with variable manifestations. New developments in the understanding and treatment of SLE mandated closer monitoring of the disease activity and its response to treatment. Current disease activity indices (e.g. SLEDAI SELENA, BILAG & SLAM) have their own limitations. We designed a new disease activity evaluation tool: the Lupus Activity Scoring Tool (LAST) that simplifies the approach to quantify SLE activity while maintaining high sensitivity. We have also developed an easy to use electronic application of this tool.

Primary: To validate a SLE activity tool with it correlation to the SLEDAI SELENA modification. Secondary: To test the usability and the accuracy of electronic applications of the same tool in clinical settings.

Methods:

The new disease activity tracking and evaluating tool included patient global assessment of disease activity (PGA), physician global assessment of disease activity (PHGA), and a formula incorporating the current immunomodulating medication used as an indication of SLE activity. The LAST included C3, C4 and Anti-ds Anti-DNA titer abnormalities as activity indicators. Patients who met the SLE ACR 1997 criteria update were seen in a rheumatology clinic within the last 12 months and had the laboratory investigations done within 2 weeks of their visit. The SLEDAI was calculated for each visit. Five different systems (algorithms) of weighting the different variables of disease activity were calculated. Apple iPad and Windows web-based applications were developed for the LAST and a clinical only LAST (without incorporating serological values). Descriptive statistics and correlation bivariates (Pearson’s & Spearman’s) were conducted. Each algorithm result and the disease activity of patients with multiple assessments were compared to the SLEDAI SELENA scores.

Results:

Twenty three patients (91% females) with 43 assessments were included. Scores from 5 algorithms of the variables in addition to the SLEDAI SELENA scores were obtained at each visit. The mean (SD) age was 47.97 (14.61) years and the mean (SD) of disease duration was 12.26 (6.47) years. The mean (SD) SLEDAI score was 6.30 (4.01). The mean (SD) LAST (with C3, C4 and Anti-ds DNA) score was 39.85 (18.67). The correlation between the two new activity indices was very high: 0.920 with p<0.001. The SLEDAI scores were consistent with the LAST scores at the baseline and follow-up visits: SLEDAI scores 0-4 corresponded to the LAST scores of 0-30 while SLEDAI scores of 8 or higher corresponded to 50 and higher, respectively. The electronic applications of the LAST were easy to use and no errors were found with their results as compared to the manually obtained scores.

Conclusion:

The Lupus Activity Scoring Tool (LAST) is a new disease activity index correlated well with the SLEDAI SELENA modification. The use of simple clinical variables as a measure of SLE activity seems to be valid. The development of easy to use electronic apps will make the use of these activity tracking tools easier to calculate and can be possibly utilized in non-specialist settings.


Disclosure:

M. M. Khraishi,
None;

R. Aslanov,
None;

K. Fudge,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-validation-of-a-new-simple-disease-activity-tool-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-the-lupus-activity-scoring-tool-last-as-compared-to-the-sledai-selena-modification/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology