ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2915

The Utility of Lupus Serology in Predicting Outcomes of Renal Transplantation in Lupus Patients: Systematic Review and Analysis of a Large Lupus Cohort

Kristy Yap1, Murray Urowitz1,2, Quenby Mahood3, Jorge Medina-Rosas4, Arthy Sabapathy5, Daeria Lawson4, Jiandong Su1, Dafna Gladman1 and Zahi Touma1, 1Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Rheumatology, U of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Library Services, Institute of Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: outcomes, Renal disease, serologic tests and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To study the utility of lupus serology as a predictor for kidney graft outcome in: a) a systematic review (SR) of the literature and b) a lupus cohort.

Methods: For the SR, a literature search in Medline and Embase (inception-2014) was performed to identify the articles reporting on the serology at RT and on the outcome of RT. Included studies were critically appraised using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Patients who underwent RT in the identified. RT outcomes included: a) nonfunctional graft requiring dialysis ≤ 3 weeks, b) graft failure requiring permanent dialysis after 3 weeks, c) graft survival not requiring dialysis d) death. The patients were grouped into graft failure and survival. The duration of graft failure was defined as the time between RT and subsequent dialysis. The duration of graft survival was defined as the time between RT and recipient death or the end of the study with functioning graft.

Results:

The literature search identified 539 references, excluding 119 duplicates. Of the 539, 534 were not relevant to the research question. 5 studies in addition to our lupus cohort data (n= 77 patients) were included in the SR. The majority of the grafts survived to at least 1 year regardless of whether the serology was positive or negative pre transplant which is consistent with the results of our lupus cohort (Table 1). The quality assessment of the studies using the NOS revealed limitations in the domains of outcome and selection due to small sample size and a short follow up period.

32 of 1783 patients in our lupus cohort had a RT. 2 patients had a nonfunctional graft, 5 patients had graft failure (2 patients had failure <5 years and 3 ≥5 years) and 25 patients had graft survival (11 had survival ≥5 years). 1 year prior to RT, 40% of the graft failures had positive serology compared to 52% in the graft survival (Table 2). Both failure and survival groups demonstrated no clinical disease activity at 1 year prior to RT. The time to graft failure (n=5) was 9.2 ± 6.77 years. In the failure group, 2 patients died by 12.1 ± 1.0 years, 2 patients are still alive and 1 was lost to follow-up. In the graft survival group, 5 patients died by 7.1 ± 5.6 years and 1 patient was lost of follow-up. Cause of death was ischemic heart disease in 3 patients, sepsis in 2 patients and unknown in 1 patient.

Table 1: Survival of the graft in patients with positive and negative serology at RT

Seropositive patients n=33

Seronegative patients n=38

Failure at 6 months

Failure at 1 year

Failure at 6 months

Failure at 1 year

Failure at 5 years

Author

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yap 2015

0

15

0

15

0

13

0

0

1

11

Dong 2005

0

3

0

2

0

10

0

9

1

3

Rivera 1990

NA

NA

NA

NA

0

4

0

4

0

3

Amend 1977

2

6

2

6

0

2

0

2

NA

NA

Bitker 1993

0

4

0

4

NA

NA

2

4

NA

NA

Goss 1991

0

3

1

2

0

9

0

9

2

2

Total

2

31

3

29

0

38

2

28

4

19

 

Table 2.Characteristics of graft failure and survival patients in our lupus cohort

Graft Failure

n=5

Graft survival

n=25

Total Grafts

n=30

Sex (F)

100%

84%

86.7%

Age at lupus diagnosis (yr)

27.14 ± 9.66

22.28 ± 7.43

23.09 ± 7.87

Age at RT (yr)

33.79 ± 14.01

39.14 ± 8.83

38.25 ± 9.79

Lupus duration at 1st clinic visit (yr)

6.21 ± 4.19

7.60 ± 8.94

7.37 ± 8.30

Lupus duration at RT (yr)

6.65 ± 4.82

16.86 ± 8.22

15.16 ± 8.61

DNA +ve in 1 year prior

1/5

6/24 (NA n=1)

7/29

Low complements in 1 year prior

2/5

13/25

15/30

DNA +veand low C3/C4 in 1 yr prior

1/5

4/23 (NA n=2)

5/28

DNA +ve and/or low C3/C4 in 1 yr post RT

3/4 NA n=1

12/25

15/29

AMS-(serology) 1 yr prior to RT

4.90 ± 2.54

3.75 ± 4.59

3.90 ± 4.36

SDI at RT

4.00 ± 0.82

4.48 ± 2.43

4.41 ± 2.28

Months on dialysis prior to RT

33.43 ± 17.54

56.25 ± 45.55

51.86 ± 42.34

Source of allograft (Cadaver or Living)

2/5 Cadaver

1/5 Living

2/5 Unknown

11/25 Cadaver

13/25 Living

1/25 Unknown

13/30 Cadaver

14/30 Living

3/25 Unknown

Conclusion: The results of this SR found that the persistence of serological abnormalities at the time of RT was not associated with graft failure. These results are consistent with the results of our lupus cohort.


Disclosure: K. Yap, None; M. Urowitz, None; Q. Mahood, None; J. Medina-Rosas, None; A. Sabapathy, None; D. Lawson, None; J. Su, None; D. Gladman, None; Z. Touma, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yap K, Urowitz M, Mahood Q, Medina-Rosas J, Sabapathy A, Lawson D, Su J, Gladman D, Touma Z. The Utility of Lupus Serology in Predicting Outcomes of Renal Transplantation in Lupus Patients: Systematic Review and Analysis of a Large Lupus Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-utility-of-lupus-serology-in-predicting-outcomes-of-renal-transplantation-in-lupus-patients-systematic-review-and-analysis-of-a-large-lupus-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-utility-of-lupus-serology-in-predicting-outcomes-of-renal-transplantation-in-lupus-patients-systematic-review-and-analysis-of-a-large-lupus-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology