ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1091

The Utility of Electronic Consultation in the Management of Gout at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Juliana Chang1, Michelle DiFiore1 and Maida Wong2,3, 1Internal Medicine, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Orange, CA, 2Rheumatology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Orange, CA, 3Rheumatology, Tibor Rubin VA Medical Center in Long Beach, Long Beach, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Electronic Health Record and crystal-induced arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in adults worldwide. It can be managed by primary care physicians (PCPs), but complex cases often require rheumatology input. However, the average wait time for a first rheumatology clinic visit varies from 38 days to 47 weeks. By utilizing electronic consultation (e-consult) which allows two-way communications between referring and rheumatology physicians (pre-consult exchange), rheumatologists can decide whether patients can be managed by addressing the clinical questions electronically, or a face-to-face patient evaluation is necessary. We analyzed the effectiveness of gout management via e-consult compared to PCP and face-to-face rheumatology visits at the VA Medical Center in Long Beach.

Methods: A retrospective study of 133 VA gout patients from 2013 to 2014 was constructed and grouped by their management under rheumatology e-consults (n = 33), rheumatology clinic visits (n = 52), or PCP visits (n = 37). Electronic medical records were reviewed for a 24-month period from their initial gout flare or e-consult date. The effectiveness in management was measured by the change in frequency of gout flares and related emergency department (ED) visits, renal function and serum uric acid levels (sUA).

Results: Of the 48 gout e-consults, 33 cases were resolved electronically, and 15 were converted to rheumatology clinic visits. The wait time for recommendations from e-consult was 3.7 days. Face-to-face clinic visit took 20.3 days after pre-consult exchange (vs 71.3 days for direct clinic consult). Compared to PCP managed patients, both e-consult and rheumatology clinic patients have more gout attacks and related ED visits at baseline (p =0.08). They have fewer attacks in the first 12 months of management, with decreased sUA and improved renal function (p =0.06), (p =0.1), and are more likely to be treated with allopurinol, colchicine, febuxostat and corticosteroids than with NSAIDs alone (p <0.05). E-consult management was comparable but second to rheumatology clinical visits (p not significant), but beyond 12 months, disease activity was stable and similar in all groups.

Conclusion: More effective gout management can be achieved by referring patients with uncontrolled disease to direct rheumatology visits or e-consults in the first 12 months. Patients can be transitioned to PCP management after 12 months if disease is stable. Overall, e-consult serves as a reasonable alternative in managing gout. Clinical questions can be addressed electronically resulting in a shorter wait time and more efficient referrals to the rheumatology clinic.


Disclosure: J. Chang, None; M. DiFiore, None; M. Wong, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chang J, DiFiore M, Wong M. The Utility of Electronic Consultation in the Management of Gout at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-utility-of-electronic-consultation-in-the-management-of-gout-at-the-veterans-affairs-medical-center/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-utility-of-electronic-consultation-in-the-management-of-gout-at-the-veterans-affairs-medical-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology