ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 378

The Use of Week 12 CDAI, RAPID3 and DAS28(CRP) Responses to Predict Optimal Response to Methotrexate

Gerd Burmester1, Gurjit S. Kaeley2, Jeffrey R. Curtis3, Yusuf Yazici4, Benoit Guerette5, Xin Wang5, Alan Friedman5 and Vibeke Strand6, 1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 2College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 5AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6Adjunct, Division of Immunology / Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical Response, Disease Activity and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects: Novel Biomarkers and Other Measurements of Disease Activity

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose The prediction of treatment outcomes based on early response could guide treatment decisions in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective was to determine if disease state at wk 12 in pts treated with a lower dose of methotrexate (MTX) + adalimumab (ADA), assessed by CDAI, DAS28(CRP) and RAPID3, was predictive of an SDAI response at a later time point, comparable to that achieved by pts receiving a high dose of MTX+ADA.

Methods

Data for this post hoc analysis originated from 2 randomized controlled trials. In CONCERTO, pts with early RA received ADA + 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg/wk MTX. In MUSICA, pts with moderate to severe RA and an inadequate response to MTX, received ADA + 7.5 or 20 mg/wk MTX. “Achievers” were defined as pts achieving optimal SDAI responses comparable to those in the top 40thpercentile (pct) receiving 20 mg/wk MTX + ADA. For CONCERTO, achievers had SDAI scores at wk 16 ≤6.8, wk 20 ≤5.0 and wk 26 ≤4.2; for MUSICA, achievers had SDAIs at wk 16 ≤15.4, wk 20 ≤11.8 and wk 24 ≤11. The following outcomes at wk 12 were compared in achievers vs non-achievers: CDAI, DAS28(CRP) and RAPID3. The likelihood of predicting optimal SDAI responses was assessed by ROC analysis using logistic regression with wk 12 CDAI, DAS28(CRP) and RAPID3 as predictors. Optimal ROC thresholds based on sensitivity and specificity, as well as those with satisfactory negative and positive predictive values (N/PPV), were calculated.

Results

In CONCERTO, 11/98 (11.2%), 10/100 (10%), 21/99 (21.2%) and 21/98 (21.4%) of pts receiving 2.5, 5, 10 and 20mg/wk MTX, respectively, were achievers; In MUSICA, 29/154 (18.8%) and 28/155 (18.1%) in 7.5 and 20 mg /wk MTX groups, respectively, were achievers. ROC-AUC, PPV and NPV indicated that wk 12 CDAI, DAS28(CRP), and RAPID3 were good predictors of optimal SDAI responses (table). Across selected thresholds, all three criteria provided good NPV for all MTX groups. In CONCERTO, non-achievers in CDAI remission/LDA at wk 12 achieved SDAI remission (≤3.3) or LDA (≤11) at wk 26; most pts in CDAI MDA or HDA at wk 12 did not.  In MUSICA, in the 7.5 mg MTX treatment group, non-achievers in CDAI remission/LDA at wk 12 reached SDAI LDA (≤11) or MDA (11-26) at wk 24; 72.5% of pts in wk 12 CDAI MDA did not achieve optimal SDAI responses.

Table: AUC, PPV and NPV of wk 12 CDAI, RAPID3 and DAS28 (CRP) for prediction of optimal SDAI response

 

MTX dose (mg/wk)

Wk 12 criterion

Area under curve (95%CI)

ROC thres-hold

Sensitivity

1-specificity

PPV

NPV

CONCERTO

 

2.5

CDAI

0.907 (0.837, 0.977)

3.6

0.455

0.038

0.625

0.926

5*

 

0.758 (0.562, 0.953)

7.3

0.700

0.190

0.304

0.958

10

 

0.902 (0.841, 0.963)

2.5

0.571

0.056

0.750

0.881

20

 

0.923 (0.870,0.976)

2.6

0.631

0.082

0.666

0.905

2.5

RAPID3

0.879 (0.796, 0.962)

0.6

0.450

0.038

0.625

0.925

5*

 

0.807 (0.711, 0.902)

6.3

0.900

0.265

0.290

0.984

10

 

0.863 (0.784, 0.943)

2.6

0.570

0.100

0.600

0.872

20

 

0.839 (0.738, 0.941)

1.9

0.631

0.111

0.600

0.901

2.5

DAS28

0.870 (0.790, 0.950)

1.6

0.180

0.012

0.667

0.895

5*

 

0.755 (0.566, 0.944)

2.8

0.700

0.167

0.333

0.959

10

 

0.890 (0.818, 0.960)

2.0

0.619

0.098

0.650

0.888

20

 

0.923 (0.870, 0.976)

2.5

0.894

0.150

0.608

0.968

MUSICA

 

7.5

CDAI

0.822 (0.749, 0897)

4.1

0.222

0.19

0.750

0.833

20

 

0.946 (0.908, 0.983)

8.7

0.851

0.056

0.793

0.962

7.5*

RAPID3

0.765 (0.673, 0.858)

7.9

0.740

0.243

0.444

0.919

20

 

0.839 (0.764, 0.914)

3.4

0.444

0.077

0.600

0.865

7.5

DAS28

0.814 (0.740, 0.888)

2.7

0.330

0.050

0.600

0.849

20

 

0.940 (0.901, 0.979)

3.3

0.925

0.121

0.658

0.979

For CONCERTO, optimal SDAI response was SDAI at wk 16 ≤6.8, wk 20 ≤5.0 and wk 26 ≤4.2; for MUSICA, optimal SDAI response was SDAI at wk16 ≤15.4, wk20 ≤11.8 and wk 24 ≤11.

ROC thresholds with NPV≥0.8 and PPV≥0.6 are presented, except for the groups indicated by the asterisk, where the optimal ROC cut-off is presented.

 

Conclusion

CDAI and RAPID3 are quick, convenient tools to assess treatment response, and correlated well with DAS28(CRP) as predictors of later outcome in the CONCERTO and MUSICA trials.  In pts with early RA receiving lower doses of MTX, the achievement of remission or LDA targets at wk 12 was predictive of a subsequent optimal SDAI treatment response comparable to pts receiving higher MTX doses. Based on these data, pts in MDA/HDA at wk 12 might benefit from an adjustment of therapy.


Disclosure:

G. Burmester,

AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, Roche,

2,

AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Merck, MedImmune, UCB, Roche,

5,

AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Merck, UCB, Roche,

8;

G. S. Kaeley,

AbbVie,

5;

J. R. Curtis,

AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, BMS, Janssen and CORRONA,

2,

Genentech, UCB, Janssen, Amgen and CORRONA,

5;

Y. Yazici,

AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Horizon, UCB and Pfizer,

5;

B. Guerette,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

X. Wang,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

A. Friedman,

AbbVie, Inc.,

1,

AbbVie, Inc.,

3;

V. Strand,

AbbVie, Afferent, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Bioventus, BMS, Carbylan, Celgene, Celltrion, CORRONA, Crescendo, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Hospira, Iroko, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, SKK, Takeda, UCB, Vertex,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-week-12-cdai-rapid3-and-das28crp-responses-to-predict-optimal-response-to-methotrexate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology