ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2320

The Use of Doppler Ultrasound in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Improves Patient Understanding of Disease and Adherence to Treatment and Alters Clinical Practice

Fred Joshua1, Christine Bailey2, Mona Marabani3, Evange Romas4, Raymond White3 and Peter Wong5, 1Combined Rheumatology Practice and Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, 2AbbVie, Sydney, Australia, 3Private Rheumatology Practice, Sydney, Australia, 4Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 5Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic and University of New South Wales Rural Clinical School, Coffs Harbour, Australia

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: clinical practice and education, Doppler ultrasound, patient

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster III: Patient Reported Outcomes, Patient Education and Preferences

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Doppler ultrasound (DUS) can detect subclinical joint inflammation and can be used to predict disease relapse or flare in patients with RA. The objectives of the present study were to assess 1) the current use of DUS, 2) if DUS and visual aids with explanation improved patient understanding of disease, and 3) whether exposure to DUS alters rheumatologists’ clinical practice.

Methods:

Australian rheumatologists were invited to take part in the DEDUCE Medical Practice Activity that enrolled 4−6 RA patients from each practice aged ≥18 years in DAS28 remission. Rheumatologists and patients completed a pre-activity survey assessing experience of DUS prior to DUS evaluation using the US7 score. Rheumatologists discussed results with patients using specifically developed visual aids. Patients and rheumatologists then completed post-activity questionnaires followed by a final survey six months later. Summary statistics were used as appropriate.

Results:

Eighty patients recruited by 21 rheumatologists completed pre-activity questionnaires. Patients who had previously undergone DUS found it improved their understanding of RA (18/19, 95%) and likelihood of medication adherence (16/19, 84%). Fifteen of the 21 rheumatologists had previously used DUS. Ten (67%) used DUS in patients in clinical remission and low disease activity (LDA) while 12/15 (80%) and 9/15 (60%) agreed it aided patient communication and medication adherence, respectively. The most common reasons for not using DUS were cost, inconvenience, and concern regarding usefulness and practicality.

Sixty six patients completed post-activity questionnaires. Of the 58 patients who had post-DUS discussions with their rheumatologist, 51 (88%) reported these improved understanding of their disease and 55 (95%) believed that it will encourage them to take medications as prescribed. Fifty of the 61 (82%) patients whose discussions utilised the visual aids found them useful. Overall, 56/66 (85%) of patients agreed DUS was useful in assessing disease activity.

Immediately post-activity, 20/21 (95%) of rheumatologists felt they would use DUS to guide therapeutic decisions and 16/21 (76%) found the visual aids useful for patient communication. Thirteen of 21 (62%) thought DUS would aid patient medication adherence.

Six months post-activity, all but one physician (95%) intended to continue to use DUS in their clinical practice. 15/21 (71%) of the rheumatologists had incorporated DUS into routine clinical practice, mainly for patients in LDA. Nineteen rheumatologists (91%) believed DUS aided patient understanding and 17 (81%) believed it assisted communication with patients.

Conclusion: Almost all rheumatologists and patients who experienced DUS felt that it was a useful clinical tool. Communication of results using visual aids enabled patients to better understand their disease and increased the likelihood of medication adherence. Importantly, at 6 months the vast majority of participating rheumatologists had incorporated DUS into routine clinical practice.


Disclosure: F. Joshua, None; C. Bailey, None; M. Marabani, None; E. Romas, None; R. White, None; P. Wong, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Joshua F, Bailey C, Marabani M, Romas E, White R, Wong P. The Use of Doppler Ultrasound in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Improves Patient Understanding of Disease and Adherence to Treatment and Alters Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-doppler-ultrasound-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-improves-patient-understanding-of-disease-and-adherence-to-treatment-and-alters-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-doppler-ultrasound-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-improves-patient-understanding-of-disease-and-adherence-to-treatment-and-alters-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology